High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping for Developing Novel Biostimulants: From Lab to Field or From Field to Lab?

Plant biostimulants which include bioactive substances (humic acids, protein hydrolysates and seaweed extracts) and microorganisms (mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria of strains belonging to the genera Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Rhizobium spp.) are gaining prominence in agricultural systems because of their potential for improving nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stressors, and crop quality. Highly accurate non-destructive phenotyping techniques have attracted the interest of scientists and the biostimulant industry as an efficient means for elucidating the mode of biostimulant activity. High-throughput phenotyping technologies successfully employed in plant breeding and precision agriculture, could prove extremely useful in unraveling biostimulant-mediated modulation of key quantitative traits and would also facilitate the screening process for development of effective biostimulant products in controlled environments and field conditions. This perspective article provides an innovative discussion on how small, medium, and large high-throughput phenotyping platforms can accelerate efforts for screening numerous biostimulants and understanding their mode of action thanks to pioneering sensor and image-based phenotyping techniques. Potentiality and constraints of small-, medium-, and large-scale screening platforms are also discussed. Finally, the perspective addresses two screening approaches, “lab to field” and “field to lab,” used, respectively, by small/medium and large companies for developing novel and effective second generation biostimulant products.

[1]  K. H. Kjaer,et al.  3D Laser Triangulation for Plant Phenotyping in Challenging Environments , 2015, Sensors.

[2]  Louise M. Nelson,et al.  Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[3]  S. Sánchez‐Cortés,et al.  Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: chemical and metabolomic approaches , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..

[4]  M. Hawkesford,et al.  Field Scanalyzer: An automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[5]  F. Baret,et al.  High-Throughput Phenotyping of Plant Height: Comparing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Ground LiDAR Estimates , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[6]  Elison B. Blancaflor,et al.  Root Traits and Phenotyping Strategies for Plant Improvement , 2015, Plants.

[7]  M. Schiavon,et al.  Alfalfa plant-derived biostimulant stimulate short-term growth of salt stressed Zea mays L. plants , 2012, Plant and Soil.

[8]  Patrick S Schnable,et al.  A high-throughput , field-based phenotyping technology for tall biomass crops , 2018 .

[9]  S. Pascale,et al.  Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. , 2017 .

[10]  H. Jones,et al.  A practical method using a network of fixed infrared sensors for estimating crop canopy conductance and evaporation rate , 2018 .

[11]  Jan F. Humplík,et al.  Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses – a review , 2015, Plant Methods.

[12]  E. Kombrink,et al.  Facile high-throughput forward chemical genetic screening by in situ monitoring of glucuronidase-based reporter gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  Lukáš Spíchal,et al.  An Automated Method for High-Throughput Screening of Arabidopsis Rosette Growth in Multi-Well Plates and Its Validation in Stress Conditions , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[14]  P. Perata,et al.  Physiological responses to Megafol® treatments in tomato plants under drought stress: A phenomic and molecular approach , 2014 .

[15]  Dominic Williams,et al.  A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions , 2017, Plant Methods.

[16]  A. Walter,et al.  Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions , 2016, Plant Methods.

[17]  K. Omasa,et al.  Estimating rice yield related traits and quantitative trait loci analysis under different nitrogen treatments using a simple tower-based field phenotyping system with modified single-lens reflex cameras , 2017 .

[18]  Hao Yang,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing for Field-Based Crop Phenotyping: Current Status and Perspectives , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[19]  G. Hicks,et al.  High throughput selection of novel plant growth regulators: Assessing the translatability of small bioactive molecules from Arabidopsis to crops. , 2016, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[20]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Close range hyperspectral imaging of plants: A review , 2017 .

[21]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Proximal Remote Sensing Buggies and Potential Applications for Field-Based Phenotyping , 2014 .

[22]  T. Mockler,et al.  High throughput phenotyping to accelerate crop breeding and monitoring of diseases in the field. , 2017, Current opinion in plant biology.

[23]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[24]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions , 2015 .

[25]  Achim Walter,et al.  The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: a cable-suspended multi-sensor system. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[26]  Y. Rouphael,et al.  A Vegetal Biopolymer-Based Biostimulant Promoted Root Growth in Melon While Triggering Brassinosteroids and Stress-Related Compounds , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[27]  Stefano Pignatti,et al.  Geophysical and Hyperspectral Data Fusion Techniques for In‐Field Estimation of Soil Properties , 2013 .

[28]  Y. Rouphael,et al.  Biostimulants in horticulture , 2015 .

[29]  S. Sankaran,et al.  Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review , 2015 .

[30]  Anamika Mishra,et al.  Plant phenotyping: a perspective , 2016, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology.

[31]  Y. Rouphael,et al.  Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, nutrient uptake, yield and grain quality of winter wheat , 2015 .

[32]  P. Jardin Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation , 2015 .

[33]  Jinha Jung,et al.  A ground based platform for high throughput phenotyping , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[34]  C. Klukas,et al.  Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[35]  T. Pridmore,et al.  Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge , 2017, Current Biology.