Population Dynamics in Variable Environments. VII. The Demography and Evolution of Iteroparity

A dynamic analysis is presented of the manner in which survival rates and reproductive schedules evolve in variable environments. This approach accounts for (1) age structure, (2) density-independent fluctuations in vital rates, (3) life histories of arbitrary length, (4) variance and covariance of vital rates, and (5) an incorporation of genotypic differences in life history. The results indicate that there is no general advantage to a more iteroparous life history in a variable environment and that the direction of evolution depends on the absolute amount of environmental variation and the correlation structure of the vital rates. Analysis of "indifference" curves also indicates that there is considerable potential for neutral evolution with respect to life history, given genotypic differences in environmental sensitivity. We suggest two nonexclusive partial answers to Cole's paradox. One is that the magnitude of environmental variability and the correlation structure of vital rates cause short-lived, early-reproducing semelparous life histories to be disadvantageous within populations. The other answer is that, if stochastic growth rates are nonnegative, such life histories have higher extinction rates when their stochastic growth rates equal those of more-iteroparous life histories, given that all the life histories share a constraint on the average life history.

[1]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Selection for Optimal Life Histories: The Effects of Age Structure , 1974 .

[2]  Nathan Keyfitz,et al.  Introduction to the mathematics of population , 1968 .

[3]  Life not lived due to disequilibrium in heterogeneous age-structured populations. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  T. Snell.  Fecundity, developmental time, and population growth rate , 2004, Oecologia.

[5]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Ergodicity of age structure in populations with Markovian vital rates, III: Finite-state moments and growth rate; an illustration , 1977, Advances in Applied Probability.

[6]  S. Orzack.  Population Dynamics in Variable Environments. V. The Genetics of Homeostasis Revisited , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[7]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  Latitudinal Variation in Reproductive Characteristics of American Shad (Alosa sapidissima): Evidence for Population Specific Life History Strategies in Fish , 1978 .

[8]  P. H. Leslie.  THE INTRINSIC RATE OF INCREASE AND THE OVERLAP OF SUCCESSIVE GENERATIONS IN A POPULATION OF GUILLEMOTS (URIA AALGE PONT.) , 1966 .

[9]  N. Stamp,et al.  Iteroparity and Semelparity in Insects , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[10]  F. Taylor.  Convergence to the Stable Age Distribution in Populations of Insects , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. Goodman.  Risk spreading as an adaptive strategy in iteroparous life histories. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.

[12]  S. Tuljapurkar,et al.  An uncertain life: demography in random environments. , 1989, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  M. C. Baker,et al.  Demography of White‐Crowned Sparrows (Zonotrichia Leucophrys Nuttalli) , 1981 .

[14]  J. Sarukhán,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR AND ITS INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN A TROPICAL PALM, ASTROCARYUM MEXICANUM , 1982 .

[15]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  High population persistence in a system with high turnover , 1987, Nature.

[16]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population dynamics in variable environments I. Long-run growth rates and extinction , 1980 .

[17]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  L. Kirkendall.  On Defining "Breeding Once" , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. H Pollard,et al.  Mathematical Models for the Growth of Human Populations , 1973 .

[20]  H. Caswell,et al.  Role of environmental variability in the evolution of life history strategies. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  R. Lewontin,et al.  On population growth in a randomly varying environment. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  N. Slade,et al.  The effect of skewed distributions of vital statistics on growth of age-structured populations , 1984 .

[23]  J. Levinton,et al.  Repeatability of taxon longevity in successive foraminifera radiations and a theory of random appearance and extinction. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  L. C. Cole.  The Population Consequences of Life History Phenomena , 1954, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. , 1981, Genetics.

[26]  E. Charnov,et al.  Life-History Consequences of Natural Selection: Cole's Result Revisited , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[27]  The problem of time unit in Leslie's population model , 1980 .

[28]  R. Lande,et al.  A Quantitative Genetic Theory of Life History Evolution , 1982 .

[29]  W. Schaffer.  Optimal Reproductive Effort in Fluctuating Environments , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[30]  M. G. Bulmer,et al.  Selection for Iteroparity in a Variable Environment , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .

[32]  G. I. Murphy.  Pattern in Life History and the Environment , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[33]  P Holgate,et al.  Population survival and life history phenomena. , 1967, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  S. Stearns.  Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[35]  D. Reznick.  Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence , 1985 .

[36]  S. Tuljapurkar.  Population dynamics in variable environments. II. Correlated environments, sensitivity analysis and dynamics , 1982 .

[37]  J. Millar,et al.  Life Histories of Mammals: An Analysis of Life Tables , 1983 .