Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems

As tactile feedback and degree of freedom for instrument movement are restricted in laparoscopic surgery, the video image plays the most crucial role in giving the surgeon information about the performance of the operation. The development of small, reliable, high-resolution imaging systems is essential for the surgeon’s acquisition detailed information about the tissues being manipulated. Image quality depends on each component of the laparoscopic imaging unit. In this context, it is crucial for the surgeon to have an understanding of how the video signal is formed, transmitted, and displayed. Moreover, the surgeon also needs to have an idea about the basic principles and specifications of the surgical video systems (i.e. chargecoupled device (CCD) camera, monitors, and digitizers). This knowledge is essential for choosing pieces of equipment and knowing how to assemble them into a functional operating suite. The aim of this review is to provide the surgeon with the basics of video signaling, and to familiarize him or her with the technical principles of the surgical video systems. An insight into the future of laparoscopic video systems also is made, and practical tips for improving image quality and troubleshooting are given throughout the article.

[1]  R. Clayman,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. , 1996, Journal of endourology.

[2]  Joyce E. Farrell,et al.  Fitting Physical Screen Parameters to the Human Eye , 2009 .

[3]  Brian Evans Understanding Digital TV: The Route to Hdtv , 1995 .

[4]  G. Berci,et al.  Individual assessment of visual perception by surgeons observing the same laparoscopic organs with various imaging systems , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  G. Buess,et al.  [Comparative study of endoscopic 2-D and 3-D imaging systems]. , 1996, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress.

[6]  A. Li,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  D. Birkett,et al.  3-D imaging in gastrointestinal laparoscopy , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  P N Fuller,et al.  Microendoscopic surgery: a comparison of four microendoscopes and a review of the literature. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Y. Dion,et al.  Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  W. P. Geis Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  S. Schwaitzberg Use of microlaparoscopy in diagnostic procedures: a case report. , 1995, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[12]  Griffin Wp Three-dimensional imaging in endoscopic surgery. , 1995 .

[13]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Bernard Grob,et al.  Basic television and video systems , 1954 .

[15]  P. Indman Instruments and video cameras for operative hysteroscopy. , 1992, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  F Tendick,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.