Fundamental two-stage formulation for Bayesian system identification, Part I: General theory

Structural system identification is concerned with the determination of structural model parameters (e.g., stiffness, mass) based on measured response data collected from the subject structure. For linear structures, one popular strategy is to adopt a ‘two-stage’ approach. That is, modal identification (e.g., frequency, mode shape) is performed in Stage I, whose information is used for inferring the structural parameters in Stage II. Different variants of Bayesian two-stage formulations have been proposed in the past. A prediction error model is commonly introduced to build a link between Stages I and II, treating the most probable values of the natural frequencies and mode shapes identified in Stage I as ‘data’ for Stage II. This type of formulation, which casts a prediction error model through descriptive statistics, involves heuristics that distort the fundamental nature of the Bayesian approach, although it has appeared to be inevitable. In this paper, a fundamental theory is developed for the Bayesian two-stage problem. The posterior distribution of structural parameters is derived rigorously in terms of the information available in the problem, namely the prior distribution of structural parameters, the posterior distribution of modal parameters in Stage I and the distribution of modal parameters conditional on the structural parameters that connects Stages I and II. The theory reveals a fundamental principle that ensures no double-counting of prior information in the two-stage identification process. Mathematical statements are also derived that provide insights into the role of the structural modeling error. Beyond the original structural model identification problem that motivated the work, the developed theory can be applied in more general settings. In the companion paper, examples with synthetic and real experimental data are provided to illustrate the proposed theory.

[1]  R. T. Cox The Algebra of Probable Inference , 1962 .

[2]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  Structural identification based on optimally weighted modal residuals , 2007 .

[3]  James L. Beck,et al.  Two-Stage Structural Health Monitoring Approach for Phase I Benchmark Studies , 2004 .

[4]  James L. Beck,et al.  Monitoring Structural Health Using a Probabilistic Measure , 2001 .

[5]  Costas Argyris,et al.  Uncertainty Calibration of Large-Order Models of Bridges Using Ambient Vibration Measurements , 2014 .

[6]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[7]  Kenneth G. McConnell,et al.  Modal testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Asymptotic Expansions for Reliabilities and Moments of Uncertain Dynamic Systems , 1995 .

[9]  Gerhart I. Schuëller,et al.  A stochastic model updating technique for complex aerospace structures , 2011 .

[10]  S. Au Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part I: Posterior most probable value , 2012 .

[11]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Bayesian operational modal analysis: Theory, computation, practice , 2013 .

[12]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fundamental two-stage formulation for Bayesian system identification, Part II: Application to ambient vibration data , 2016 .

[13]  S. Au Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part II: Posterior uncertainty , 2012 .

[14]  R. T. Cox,et al.  The Algebra of Probable Inference , 1962 .

[15]  D Malakoff,et al.  Bayes Offers a 'New' Way to Make Sense of Numbers , 1999, Science.

[16]  R. Baierlein Probability Theory: The Logic of Science , 2004 .

[17]  J. Beck,et al.  Asymptotic Expansions for Reliability and Moments of Uncertain Systems , 1997 .

[18]  James L. Beck,et al.  A Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[19]  N. Bleistein,et al.  Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals , 1975 .

[20]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  Structural model updating and prediction variability using Pareto optimal models , 2008 .

[21]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching , 2006 .

[22]  L. Katafygiotis,et al.  Tangential‐projection algorithm for manifold representation in unidentifiable model updating problems , 2002 .

[23]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Resolution and uncertainty analysis of Bayesian FE model updating results , 2011 .

[24]  J. Beck Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .