Artificial daylight photodynamic therapy with “non-inflammatory” doses of hexyl aminolevulinate only marginally delays SCC development in UV-exposed hairless mice

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for actinic keratoses, but is associated with pain and post-treatment inflammation. Daylight-mediated PDT and PpIX-precursors at low concentrations reduce pain and inflammation intensity. The objective was to evaluate the effect of repeated low-concentration PDT combined with artificial daylight on SCC development. Mice ( n = 265) were exposed to simulated solar UV-irradiation (UVR) 3 times weekly mimicking “summer-dose”-exposure (3 SED). Selected groups of mice received a “winter-dose”-exposure (0.6 SED) for the first 90 days. PDT was delivered with 0.1%, 0.05% and 0.02% hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) cream and artificial daylight for 2.5 hours (6 J cm^−2) in different treatment regimes (1-3 times weekly, 45-days intervals, days 1-180 and from day 180 onwards). The primary end-point was the time to first SCC (1 mm diameter). 0.1% HAL-PDT given 3 times weekly slightly delayed SCC development and induced minimal inflammation. In winter- and summer UVR-treatment regimes, 0.1% HAL PDT delayed the time to first SCC compared to control UVR and placebo-PDT when mice were PDT-treated on days 1-180 (median 213 vs. 199 days, p = 0.011) and from day 180 onwards (median 218 vs. 199 days, p = 0.006). PDT with 0.05% and 0.02% HAL did not influence SCC development (medians 206 days, p = ns). In summer UVR-exposed mice, 0.1% HAL-PDT marginally postponed the time to first SCC compared to control UVR (median 160 days) when treatments were given 3 times weekly for 180 days (median 166, p = 0.01), but not for 90 days (median 161, p = 0.112). In conclusion, repeated low-concentration HAL-PDT combined with artificial daylight is well-tolerated, but only marginally delays SCC development in mice.

[1]  H. Wulf,et al.  Weather conditions and daylight‐mediated photodynamic therapy: protoporphyrin IX‐weighted daylight doses measured in six geographical locations , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  H. Wulf,et al.  The relation between methyl aminolevulinate concentration and inflammation after photodynamic therapy in healthy volunteers , 2012, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences.

[3]  P Calzavara-Pinton,et al.  Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: an international consensus , 2012, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[4]  H. Wulf,et al.  Porphyrin biodistribution in UV‐exposed murine skin after methyl‐ and hexyl‐aminolevulinate incubation , 2012, Experimental dermatology.

[5]  H. Wulf,et al.  Continuous ultra‐low‐intensity artificial daylight is not as effective as red LED light in photodynamic therapy of multiple actinic keratoses , 2011, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[6]  R. Bissonnette,et al.  Photodynamic therapy with methylaminolevulinate 80 mg/g without occlusion improves acne vulgaris. , 2010, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[7]  H. Wulf,et al.  Photodynamic therapy with topical methyl‐ and hexylaminolevulinate for prophylaxis and treatment of UV‐induced SCC in hairless mice , 2010, Experimental dermatology.

[8]  Desmond I. J. Morrow,et al.  Hexyl aminolaevulinate is a more effective topical photosensitiser precursor than methyl aminolaevulinate and 5-aminolaevulinic acids when applied in equimolar doses. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  Peter K. Lee,et al.  Reduction in the Incidence of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Treated with Cyclic Photodynamic Therapy , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[10]  P. Bjerring,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using 5‐aminolevulinic acid 0.5% liposomal spray and intense pulsed light in combination with topical keratolytic agents , 2010, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[11]  H. Wulf,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with 8% and 16% methyl aminolaevulinate and home‐based daylight exposure: a double‐blinded randomized clinical trial , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[12]  J. Lear,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy With Methyl Aminolevulinate for Prevention of New Skin Lesions in Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Study , 2008, Transplantation.

[13]  H. Wulf,et al.  Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single‐blinded study , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[14]  P. Bjerring,et al.  5‐ALA for photodynamic photorejuvenation—optimization of treatment regime based on normal‐skin fluorescence measurements , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[15]  J Moan,et al.  Topical application of 5‐aminolaevulinic acid, methyl 5‐aminolaevulinate and hexyl 5‐aminolaevulinate on normal human skin , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  H. Wulf,et al.  Topical photodynamic therapy for prevention of new skin lesions in renal transplant recipients. , 2006, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[17]  P. Philipsen,et al.  Ultraviolet radiation exposure pattern in winter compared with summer based on time‐stamped personal dosimeter readings , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  J. Moan,et al.  Weekly topical application of methyl aminolevulinate followed by light exposure delays the appearance of UV-induced skin tumours in mice , 2002, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[19]  H. Lui,et al.  Systemic photodynamic therapy with aminolaevulinic acid delays the appearance of ultraviolet‐induced skin tumours in mice , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[20]  T Poulsen,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy with Topical dL‐aminolevulinic Acid Delays UV Photocarcinogenesis in Hairless Mice , 1997, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[21]  H. Wulf,et al.  In vivo estimation of pigmentation in ultraviolet‐exposed hairless mice , 1995, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[22]  H. Wulf,et al.  Sunscreens for delay of ultraviolet induction of skin tumors. , 1982, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.