Food waste quantification in primary production - The Nordic countries as a case study.

Our understanding of food waste in the food supply chain has increased, but very few studies have been published on food waste in primary production. The overall aims of this study were to quantify the total amount of food waste in primary production in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark, and to create a framework for how to define and quantify food waste in primary production. The quantification of food waste was based on case studies conducted in the present study and estimates published in scientific literature. The chosen scope of the study was to quantify the amount of edible food (excluding inedible parts like peels and bones) produced for human consumption that did not end up as food. As a result, the quantification was different from the existing guidelines. One of the main differences is that food that ends up as animal feed is included in the present study, whereas this is not the case for the recently launched food waste definition of the FUSIONS project. To distinguish the 'food waste' definition of the present study from the existing definitions and to avoid confusion with established usage of the term, a new term 'side flow' (SF) was introduced as a synonym for food waste in primary production. A rough estimate of the total amount of food waste in primary production in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark was made using SF and 'FUSIONS Food Waste' (FFW) definitions. The SFs in primary production in the four Nordic countries were an estimated 800,000 tonnes per year with an additional 100,000 tonnes per year from the rearing phase of animals. The 900,000 tonnes per year of SF corresponds to 3.7% of the total production of 24,000,000 tonnes per year of edible primary products. When using the FFW definition proposed by the FUSIONS project, the FFW amount was estimated at 330,000 tonnes per year, or 1% of the total production.

[1]  Sara Andersson Tomatens öde - En kartläggning av matsvinn i primärproduktionen , 2013 .

[2]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Improving Efficiency and Reducing Waste in Our Food System , 2004 .

[3]  Ulf Sonesson,et al.  The methodology of the FAO study: Global Food Losses and Food Waste - extent, causes and prevention”- FAO, 2011 , 2013 .

[4]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[5]  J. Gustavsson Global food losses and food waste , 2011 .

[6]  Luiza Toma,et al.  Food waste and losses in primary production: Qualitative insights from horticulture , 2017 .

[7]  D. M. Bruce,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Seed Loss when Cutting a Standing Crop of Oilseed Rape with Two Types of Combine Harvester Header , 2002 .

[8]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland. , 2013, Waste management.

[9]  J. Parfitt,et al.  Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050 , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Modelling of food loss within life cycle assessment: From current practice towards a systematisation , 2017 .

[11]  Tristram Stuart,et al.  Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal , 2009 .

[12]  Barbara Redlingshöfer,et al.  Quantifying food loss during primary production and processing in France , 2017 .

[13]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain: Stepwise investigation and the influence of quality standards on losses. , 2015, Waste management.

[14]  Géraldine Chaboud,et al.  Assessing food losses and waste with a methodological framework: Insights from a case study , 2017 .

[15]  K. Östergren,et al.  Estimates of European food waste levels , 2016 .

[16]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[17]  U. Sonesson,et al.  The environmental impact of mastitis: a case study of dairy herds. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.