The Application of 3D Zernike Moments for the Description of "Model-Free" Molecular Structure, Functional Motion, and Structural Reliability

Protein structures are not static entities consisting of equally well-determined atomic coordinates. Proteins undergo continuous motion, and as catalytic machines, these movements can be of high relevance for understanding function. In addition to this strong biological motivation for considering shape changes is the necessity to correctly capture different levels of detail and error in protein structures. Some parts of a structural model are often poorly defined, and the atomic displacement parameters provide an excellent means to characterize the confidence in an atom's spatial coordinates. A mathematical framework for studying these shape changes, and handling positional variance is therefore of high importance. We present an approach for capturing various protein structure properties in a concise mathematical framework that allows us to compare features in a highly efficient manner. We demonstrate how three-dimensional Zernike moments can be employed to describe functions, not only on the surface of a protein but throughout the entire molecule. A number of proof-of-principle examples are given which demonstrate how this approach may be used in practice for the representation of movement and uncertainty.

[1]  S. Benkovic,et al.  A Perspective on Enzyme Catalysis , 2003, Science.

[2]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Multipolar representation of protein structure , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  B. Steipe,et al.  Nh3D: A reference dataset of non-homologous protein structures , 2005, BMC Structural Biology.

[4]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Xueguang Shao,et al.  Protein-ligand recognition using spherical harmonic molecular surfaces: towards a fast and efficient filter for large virtual throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[7]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D Shape Descriptors , 2003, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[8]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[10]  B S Duncan,et al.  Approximation and visualization of large-scale motion of protein surfaces. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[11]  Nelson L. Max,et al.  Spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Analysis of binding site similarity, small-molecule similarity and experimental binding profiles in the human cytosolic sulfotransferase family , 2007, Bioinform..

[13]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.

[14]  Lora Mak,et al.  An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[15]  Bin Li,et al.  Fast protein tertiary structure retrieval based on global surface shape similarity , 2008, Proteins.

[16]  Graham J. L. Kemp,et al.  Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  M. Emre Celebi,et al.  A comparative study of three moment-based shape descriptors , 2005, International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II.

[18]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons , 2005, Bioinform..

[19]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Shape retrieval using 3D Zernike descriptors , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[20]  A. Olson,et al.  Approximation and characterization of molecular surfaces , 1993, Biopolymers.

[21]  T. Schneider,et al.  Objective comparison of protein structures: error-scaled difference distance matrices. , 2000, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[22]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory , 2001, Proteins.

[23]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[24]  T. Schneider A genetic algorithm for the identification of conformationally invariant regions in protein molecules. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  P. Agarwal,et al.  Network of coupled promoting motions in enzyme catalysis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Wand,et al.  Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Moment invariants as shape recognition technique for comparing protein binding sites , 2007, Bioinform..

[28]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: Developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic , 2002, Proteins.

[29]  J. Thornton,et al.  Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  J. Thornton,et al.  A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  von F. Zernike Beugungstheorie des schneidenver-fahrens und seiner verbesserten form, der phasenkontrastmethode , 1934 .

[33]  G. Vriend,et al.  Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints , 1997, Proteins.

[34]  Guojun Lu,et al.  Review of shape representation and description techniques , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[35]  C. Chennubhotla,et al.  Insights into equilibrium dynamics of proteins from comparison of NMR and X-ray data with computational predictions. , 2007, Structure.

[36]  L. Kay,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis , 2005, Nature.

[37]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[38]  Frances M. G. Pearl,et al.  The CATH Domain Structure Database and related resources Gene3D and DHS provide comprehensive domain family information for genome analysis , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Joelle N Pelletier,et al.  Protein motions promote catalysis. , 2004, Chemistry & biology.

[40]  D. Cruickshank,et al.  Remarks about protein structure precision. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[41]  Moe Razaz,et al.  The DynDom Database of Protein Domain Motions , 2003, Bioinform..

[42]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[43]  D. A. Bosco,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics During Catalysis , 2002, Science.

[44]  Georgia Hadjipavlou,et al.  Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[45]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites , 2008, ECCB.

[46]  Dagmar Ringe,et al.  [19]Study of protein dynamics by X-ray diffraction , 1986 .

[47]  A. Olson,et al.  Shape analysis of molecular surfaces , 1993, Biopolymers.

[48]  Scott Grandison,et al.  A rapid boundary integral equation technique for protein electrostatics , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..