Integrated model of hepatic and peripheral glucose regulation for estimation of endogenous glucose production during the hot IVGTT.

We have developed a new model to describe endogenous glucose kinetics during a labeled (hot) intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) to derive a time profile of endogenous glucose production (EGP). We reanalyzed data from a previously published study (P. Vicini, J. J. Zachwieja, K. E. Yarasheski, D. M. Bier, A. Caumo, and C. Cobelli. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E285-E294, 1999), in which insulin-modified [6,6-2H2]glucose-labeled IVGTTs (0.33 g/kg glucose) were performed in 10 normal subjects. In addition, a second tracer ([U-13C]glucose) was infused in a variable rate to clamp the endogenous glucose tracer-to-tracee ratio (TTR). Our new model describing endogenous glucose kinetics was incorporated into the two-compartment hot minimal-model structure. The model gave estimates of glucose effectiveness [1.54 +/- 0.31 (SE) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)], insulin sensitivity (37.74 +/- 5.23 10(4) dl x kg(-1) x min(-1) x microU(-1) x ml), and a new parameter describing the sensitivity of EGP to the inhibitory effect of insulin (IC50 = 0.0195 +/- 0.0046 min(-1)). The model additionally provided an estimate of the time course of EGP showing almost immediate inhibition, followed by a secondary inhibitory effect caused by infusion of insulin, and a large overshoot as EGP returns to its basal value. Our estimates show very good agreement with those obtained via deconvolution and the model-independent TTR clamp technique. These results suggest that the new integrated model can serve as a simple one-step approach to obtain metabolic indexes while also providing a parametric description of EGP.

[1]  P Vicini,et al.  Estimation of endogenous glucose production after a glucose perturbation by nonparametric stochastic deconvolution. , 1997, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[2]  P Vicini,et al.  Glucose production during an IVGTT by deconvolution: validation with the tracer-to-tracee clamp technique. , 1999, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Barthel,et al.  Novel concepts in insulin regulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  R N Bergman,et al.  Importance of Glucose Per Se to Intravenous Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of the Minimal-Model Prediction with Direct Measurements , 1985, Diabetes.

[5]  Hiroaki Tanaka,et al.  Effect of moderate exercise training on peripheral glucose effectiveness, insulin sensitivity, and endogenous glucose production in healthy humans estimated by a two-compartment-labeled minimal model. , 2004, Diabetes.

[6]  R N Bergman,et al.  Reassessment of Glucose Effectiveness and Insulin Sensitivity From Minimal Model Analysis: A Theoretical Evaluation of the Single-Compartment Glucose Distribution Assumption , 1997, Diabetes.

[7]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Partitioning glucose distribution/transport, disposal, and endogenous production during IVGTT. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  C. Kahn,et al.  Insulin signaling is required for insulin's direct and indirect action on hepatic glucose production. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  C Cobelli,et al.  Tracer-to-tracee ratio for analysis of stable isotope tracer data: link with radioactive kinetic formalism. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  I. Hramiak,et al.  A modified protocol for estimation of insulin sensitivity with the minimal model of glucose kinetics in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. , 1990, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  R N Bergman,et al.  Glucose effectiveness assessed under dynamic and steady state conditions. Comparability of uptake versus production components. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  G M Steil,et al.  Method of Insulin Administration Has No Effect on Insulin Sensitivity Estimates From the Insulin-Modified Minimal Model Protocol , 1997, Diabetes.

[13]  Daniel J Zaccaro,et al.  Minimal model-based insulin sensitivity has greater heritability and a different genetic basis than homeostasis model assessment or fasting insulin. , 2003, Diabetes.

[14]  Wojciech Krzyzanski,et al.  Mathematical Formalism and Characteristics of Four Basic Models of Indirect Pharmacodynamic Responses for Drug Infusions , 2004, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[15]  K. Petersen,et al.  Mechanism by which glucose and insulin inhibit net hepatic glycogenolysis in humans. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  C. Östenson,et al.  Insulin sensitivity of suppression of endogenous glucose production is the single most important determinant of glucose tolerance. , 2001, Diabetes.

[17]  A. Giacca,et al.  Insulin inhibits glucose production by a direct effect in diabetic depancreatized dogs during euglycemia. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[18]  C Cobelli,et al.  SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. , 1998, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[19]  C Cobelli,et al.  Normal glucose-induced suppression of glucose production but impaired stimulation of glucose disposal in type 2 diabetes: evidence for a concentration-dependent defect in uptake. , 1998, Diabetes.

[20]  C Cobelli,et al.  Minimal Models of Glucose Disappearance: Lessons from the Labelled IVGTT , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[21]  W. Jusko,et al.  Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses , 1996, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[22]  Glucose turnover in humans in the basal state and after intravenous glucose: a comparison of two models. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  K Tokuyama,et al.  Endogenous glucose production and glucose effectiveness in type 2 diabetic subjects derived from stable-labeled minimal model approach. , 1999, Diabetes.

[24]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  The hot IVGTT two-compartment minimal model: an improved version. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[25]  R. Bergman,et al.  Differences Between the Tolbutamide-Boosted and the Insulin-Modified Minimal Model Protocols , 1997, Diabetes.

[26]  C Cobelli,et al.  Hepatic glucose production during the labeled IVGTT: estimation by deconvolution with a new minimal model. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[27]  J. Romijn,et al.  Review article: Regulation of glucose production with special attention to nonclassical regulatory mechanisms: a review. , 2001, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[28]  R N Bergman,et al.  The Insulin Sensitivity Index in Nondiabetic Man: Correlation Between Clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived Values , 1986, Diabetes.

[29]  K.,et al.  Experimental validation of measurements of glucose turnover in nonsteady state. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  R. Bergman,et al.  Ability of alternative indices of insulin sensitivity to predict cardiovascular risk: comparison with the "minimal model". Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) Investigators. , 1998, Annals of epidemiology.

[31]  R. Bergman Pathogenesis and prediction of diabetes mellitus: lessons from integrative physiology. , 2002, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[32]  R. Bergman,et al.  Peripheral effects of insulin dominate suppression of fasting hepatic glucose production. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[33]  A. Cherrington,et al.  Autoregulation of hepatic glucose production. , 1998, European journal of endocrinology.

[34]  R. Bergman,et al.  A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. , 1994, Diabetes.

[35]  R. Bergman,et al.  The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study (IRAS) objectives, design, and recruitment results. , 1995, Annals of epidemiology.

[36]  Y. Z. Ider,et al.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[37]  If the minimal model is too minimal, who suffers more: SG or SI? , 1997, Diabetologia.

[38]  Ewart R. Carson,et al.  The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems : model formulation, identification, and validation , 1983 .

[39]  Hiroaki Tanaka,et al.  S(G), S(I), and EGP of exercise-trained middle-aged men estimated by a two-compartment labeled minimal model. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[40]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  A model of glucose kinetics and their control by insulin, compartmental and noncompartmental approaches , 1984 .

[41]  J D Best,et al.  Glucose Disposal is Not Proportional to Plasma Glucose Level in Man , 1981, Diabetes.

[42]  Richard M Watanabe,et al.  A Comparison Between the Minimal Model and the Glucose Clamp in the Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity Across the Spectrum of Glucose Tolerance , 1994, Diabetes.

[43]  D. Finegood,et al.  Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[44]  C Cobelli,et al.  Non-steady state: error analysis of Steele's model and developments for glucose kinetics. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.