Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models

We provide a comprehensive and user-friendly compendium of standards for the use and interpretation of structural equation models (SEMs). To both read about and do research that employs SEMs, it is necessary to master the art and science of the statistical procedures underpinning SEMs in an integrative way with the substantive concepts, theories, and hypotheses that researchers desire to examine. Our aim is to remove some of the mystery and uncertainty of the use of SEMs, while conveying the spirit of their possibilities.

[1]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[2]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable , 1975 .

[3]  R. Bagozzi.  Structural Equation Models in Experimental Research , 1977 .

[4]  D. G. Weeks,et al.  Linear structural equations with latent variables , 1980 .

[5]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Canonical Correlation Analysis As A Special Case Of A Structural Relations Model. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  G. Hesslow.  Causality and Determinism , 1981, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[9]  R. Bagozzi.  A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing , 1984 .

[10]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[11]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[12]  Steffen M. Kühnel.  Testing MANOVA Designs with LISREL , 1988 .

[13]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[14]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[15]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[16]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs , 1989 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. , 1990 .

[20]  M. Browne,et al.  The direct product model for the mtmm matrix parameterized as a second order factor analysis model , 1990 .

[21]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs: Two extensions , 1991 .

[22]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[23]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Testing Hypotheses About Methods, Traits, and Communalities in the Direct-Product Model , 1992 .

[24]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[25]  R. Bagozzi.  Effects of arousal on organization of positive and negative affect and cognitions: Application to attitude theory , 1994 .

[26]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[27]  E. Craig,et al.  The Oxford dictionary of philosophy , 2008 .

[28]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[29]  R. Audi.  The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy , 1995 .

[30]  R. Bagozzi.  The role of arousal in the creation and control of the halo effect in attitude models , 1996 .

[31]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[32]  Kent D. Nassen,et al.  Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs , 1998 .

[33]  D. Russell,et al.  Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. , 1998 .

[34]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[35]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[36]  K. Yuan,et al.  Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. , 1998, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[37]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[38]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application, Second Edition , 1999 .

[39]  Ronald H. Heck,et al.  An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques , 1999 .

[40]  P. Bentler,et al.  ML Estimation of Mean and Covariance Structures with Missing Data Using Complete Data Routines , 1999 .

[41]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[42]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[44]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[46]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[47]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures , 2001 .

[48]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[49]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[50]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[51]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[52]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research , 2003 .

[53]  T. Bechger,et al.  Structural Equation Modelling of Multiple Facet Data: Extending Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 2004 .

[54]  H. Marsh,et al.  Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[55]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[56]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-Control and the Self-Regulation of Dieting Decisions: The Role of Prefactual Attitudes, Subjective Norms, and Resistance to Temptation , 2004 .

[57]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited , 2005 .

[58]  R. Grover.  The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances , 2006 .

[59]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[60]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities , 2006 .

[61]  K. Yuan,et al.  Robust Procedures in Structural Equation Modeling , 2007 .

[62]  P. Barrett.  Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[63]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Reconsidering formative measurement. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[64]  Sik-Yum Lee.  Handbook of latent variable and related models , 2007 .

[65]  P. Bentler,et al.  A Two-Stage Approach to Missing Data: Theory and Application to Auxiliary Variables , 2009 .

[66]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Is Formative Measurement Really Measurement? Reply to Bollen (2007) and Bagozzi (2007) , 2007 .

[67]  D. Markland.  The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling , 2007 .

[68]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[69]  R. Bagozzi.  On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). , 2007, Psychological methods.

[70]  D. Iacobucci.  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About SEM (Structural Equations Modeling) But Were Afraid to Ask , 2009 .

[71]  P. Bentler,et al.  An Alternative Approach for Nonlinear Latent Variable Models , 2010 .

[72]  R. Bagozzi.  Structural equation models are modelling tools with many ambiguities: Comments acknowledging the need for caution and humility in their use , 2010 .

[73]  P. Bentler.  SEM with simplicity and accuracy. , 2010, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[74]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics , 2010 .

[75]  R. Bagozzi.  Alternative Perspectives in Philosophy of Mind and Their Relationship to Structural Equation Models in Psychology , 2011 .

[76]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations , 2011, MIS Q..

[77]  Gian Luca Marzocchi,et al.  Customer-Organization Relationships: Development and Test of a Theory of Extended Identities , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[78]  Scott L. Hershberger,et al.  Modeling Intraindividual Variability With Repeated Measures Data : Methods and Applications , 2013 .