Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects

The influence of accessibility to opportunities in trip generation continues to be debated in the specialised literature given its relevance to simulate phenomena such as induced demand. This article estimates multiple linear regression models (MLR), spatial autoregressive models (SAR), spatial autoregressive models in the error term (SEM) and spatially filtered Poisson regression models (SPO) to discover whether or not accessibility is a significant factor in trip generation using data from the urban area of Santander (Spain). The results obtained provide evidence which shows that, on an intraurban scale, more accessibility to opportunities decreases trip production in private vehicle for work purpose, whereas it increases trip production in other transport modes for non—mandatory purposes. For the correct interpretation of the estimated parameters it was important to consider the direct and indirect effects of the independent variables in the SAR production models. Finally, the validation of the models showed that the SAR and SEM models had a mean squared error slightly lower than the MLR models in predicting overall trip production. This was because the spatial models reduced the correlation of the residuals present in the MLR models. Furthermore, the SPO models performed better in validation mode than all the continuous models.

[1]  Agostino Nuzzolo,et al.  Changing accessibility, dwelling price and the spatial distribution of socio-economic activities , 2011 .

[2]  Kwang-Kyun Lim,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Alternate Econometric Structures for Trip Generation Models , 2011 .

[3]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[4]  Daniel Wu,et al.  Trip Rates and Accessibility: Gleaning Basic Planning Information from Activity-Based Travel Demand Model , 2012 .

[5]  A. Cameron,et al.  Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model☆ , 1990 .

[6]  F. Martínez TOWARDS A LAND-USE AND TRANSPORT INTERACTION FRAMEWORK. IN: HANDBOOK OF TRANSPORT MODELLING , 2007 .

[7]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[8]  Justin S. Chang,et al.  Comparative analysis of trip generation models: results using home-based work trips in the Seoul metropolitan area , 2014 .

[9]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[10]  R. Vickerman Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility , 1974 .

[11]  Adam Millard-Ball Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development , 2015 .

[12]  Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva,et al.  GIS-Based Analytical Tools for Transport Planning: Spatial Regression Models for Transportation Demand Forecast , 2014, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[13]  R. Cervero,et al.  Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá , 2009 .

[14]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modelling Transport, 2nd Edition , 1990 .

[15]  K. Small,et al.  Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport , 2010 .

[16]  Ignace Glorieux,et al.  Transportation habits: Evidence from time diary data , 2015 .

[17]  Michael G. McNally,et al.  The Four Step Model , 2007 .

[18]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[19]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[20]  James Sumner,et al.  Preparation of the Vermont Trip Generation Manual , 2012 .

[21]  Shi Chiang Li,et al.  Land Use Impacts on Trip Generation Rates , 1996 .

[22]  Charles L Purvis,et al.  Incorporating Work Trip Accessibility in Nonwork Trip Generation Models in San Francisco Bay Area , 1996 .

[23]  R. Bivand Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models , 2015 .

[24]  S. Hanson,et al.  Accessibility and Intraurban Travel , 1987 .

[25]  J. LeSage Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[26]  R. Kitamura,et al.  Accessibility in a Metropolis: Toward a Better Understanding of Land Use and Travel , 2001 .

[27]  Tobago Population and Housing Census. , 2011 .

[28]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Induced Travel Demand: Research Design, Empirical Evidence, and Normative Policies , 2002 .

[29]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Adjusting ITE's Trip Generation Handbook for urban context , 2015 .

[30]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies , 2007 .

[31]  Phil. Goodwin,et al.  Empirical evidence on induced traffic , 1996 .

[32]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  The social dimension of activity, travel and location choice behavior , 2013 .

[33]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Spatial econometrics functions in R: Classes and methods , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[34]  W. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Trip Generation in Mexico City, Mexico, with Spatial Effects and Urban Densities , 2006 .

[35]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Trip generation of vulnerable populations in three Canadian cities: a spatial ordered probit approach , 2010 .

[36]  D. Scott,et al.  Does the social environment influence active travel? An investigation of walking in Hamilton, Canada , 2013 .

[37]  M. Horner Spatial Dimensions of Urban Commuting: A Review of Major Issues and Their Implications for Future Geographic Research* , 2004, The Professional Geographer.

[38]  D. Griffith Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering: Gaining Understanding Through Theory and Scientific Visualization , 2010 .

[39]  J. LeSage,et al.  Spatial Econometric Models , 2010 .

[40]  K. Chatterjee,et al.  An exploration of the importance of social influence in the decision to start bicycling in England , 2014 .

[41]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis , 2009 .

[42]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[43]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Regression Models for Count Data in R , 2008 .

[44]  J. Ord,et al.  Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application , 2010 .

[45]  Steven Farber,et al.  Selected papers on the study of the social context of travel behaviour , 2014 .

[46]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Getting trip generation right: Eliminating the bias against mixed use development , 2013 .

[47]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Under the hood , 2002 .

[48]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[49]  Valerian Kwigizile,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Defining Geographical Connectivity for Variables of Trip Generation Models , 2009 .