Functional MRI comparison of passive and active movement: possible inhibitory role of supplementary motor area

Recent studies have hypothesized that the supplementary motor area plays a role in motor inhibition. To study this possible role, we used functional MRI study to compare conditions, which require various level of inhibition of motor patterns. Seventeen healthy participants were scanned while executing – actively or passively – rhythmic opening/closing movements of their right hand, with and without congruent visual information. The contrast passive>active movement in the visual guidance condition which requires inhibition in order ‘not’ to perform the movement, yields to significant activation of areas commonly involved in the inhibitory brain circuitry among which, notably, controlateral supplementary motor area.

[1]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  R. Hari,et al.  Stronger reactivity of the human primary motor cortex during observation of live rather than video motor acts , 2001, Neuroreport.

[3]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Motor facilitation following action observation: A behavioural study in prehensile action , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Somatic and Motor Components of Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[6]  Shuhei Yamaguchi,et al.  The Key Locus of Common Response Inhibition Network for No-go and Stop Signals , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[8]  S. Kiebel,et al.  Brain Representation of Active and Passive Movements , 1996, NeuroImage.

[9]  R J Seitz,et al.  Recruitment of contralesional motor cortex in stroke patients with recovery of hand function , 2005, Neurology.

[10]  R. Byrne,et al.  Priming primates: Human and otherwise , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  W. Singer,et al.  The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Cerebral activation patterns related to initiation and inhibition of hand movement , 2007, Neuroreport.

[14]  A. Aron The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[15]  Guy Orban,et al.  The Role of Lateral Occipitotemporal Junction and Area MT/V5 in the Visual Analysis of Upper-Limb Postures , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Pekar,et al.  Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  C. Kennard,et al.  The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Distinct striatal regions support movement selection, preparation and execution , 2004, Neuroreport.

[21]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  M. Erb,et al.  Brain Representation of Active and Passive Hand Movements in Children , 2007, Pediatric Research.

[23]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The classic supplementary motor area is formed by two independent areas. , 1996, Advances in neurology.