The Combination of Wavelet Transform And Nonlinear Filtering For Time-lapse Seismic Difference Analysis

In this paper, we propose a method for time-lapse seismic difference analysis by combining the wavelet transform and nonlinear filtering methods. The nonlinear filter methods we used include median filter and morphological operations, which both show good properties for removing noise and extracting objects. Wavelet transform is a good tool for multi-scale analysis. A combination of the two has the potential to obtain better results than using a single method. We tested our method using both synthetic and real time-lapse seismic data. The results show that the processed time-lapse seismic differences have a clearer background and therefore are easy to interpret.

[1]  Amos Nur Four‐dimesional seismology and (true) direct detection of hydrocarbons: The petrophysical basis , 1989 .

[2]  Ronald A. Behrens,et al.  4D Seismic Monitoring of Water Influx at Bay Marchand: The Practical Use of 4D in an Imperfect World , 2002 .

[3]  Curtis A. Link,et al.  Time-lapse Seismic Attribute Interpretation of a Turbidite Analog Reservoir Model Using Neural Networks , 2005 .

[4]  J. Astola,et al.  Fundamentals of Nonlinear Digital Filtering , 1997 .

[5]  Vijay K. Madisetti,et al.  The Digital Signal Processing Handbook , 1997 .

[6]  Marco Cesar Schinelli Using Complex Seismic Attributes to Improve 4D Visibility of Fluids Contact Movement. , 2006 .

[7]  S. N. Domenico,et al.  Effect of water saturation on seismic reflectivity of sand reservoirs encased in shale , 1974 .

[8]  Long Jin,et al.  Time-lapse image registration using the local similarity attribute , 2009 .

[9]  Alexandre Bertrand,et al.  A high resolution workflow for 4D‐friendly analysis: application to gas‐oil contact monitoring at Troll West , 2005 .

[10]  Terrance J. Fulp,et al.  AAPG Memoir 42 and SEG Investigations in Geophysics, No. 9, Chapter 9 (Case Histories of Three-Dimensional Seismic Surveys) -- Case History 4: Three-Dimensional Seismic Monitoring of An Enhanced Oil Recovery Process , 1987 .

[11]  Rodney Calvert,et al.  Insights and Methods for 4D Reservoir Monitoring and Characterization , 2005 .

[12]  Bruce P. Marion,et al.  Crosswell seismic imaging of reservoir changes caused by CO 2 injection , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas L. Davis,et al.  Statistical applications for quantitative reservoir characterization and monitoring at West Pearl Queen field, Lea County, New Mexico , 2004 .

[14]  Peter B. Flemings,et al.  Time-lapse (4-D) seismic monitoring of primary production of turbidite reservoirs at South Timbalier Block 295, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico , 2000 .

[15]  Andrew Dilay,et al.  Seismic monitoring of steam‐based recovery of bitumen , 1994 .

[16]  Charles E. Houston SEISMIC PATHS, ASSUMING A PARABOLIC INCREASE OF VELOCITY WITH DEPTH , 1939 .