Ups and Downs of Computers Science Projects in Primary and Secondary Canadian Schools

The overall objective of this research project was to gain a deeper understanding of the benefits and challenges of using laptops in primary and secondary school in 30 Canadian schools. In all, 2,432 students (grades 3 to 11), 272 teachers, 14 education support staff and three school principals participated in the data collection. Three main data collection instruments were used: survey questionnaires, individual semi-directed interviews, and group interviews. Of the students surveyed, 92% had a computer at home, 63.3% had a cell phone and 67.7% used a portable digital reader such as an MP3 device or iPod. On the other hand, 11% of the students did not have an Internet connection at home, whence the importance of the school, which provides their only opportunity for full Internet access. Overall, the data collected highlights 12 main benefits of using laptops. The preliminary results of this study indicate that the „one laptop per child‟ strategy fully contributes to students‟ academic success at the participating schools. The lesson retained is that, despite the technical and pedagogical challenges, this innovative initiative to provide „one laptop per child‟ has produced incontestable gains in both teaching and learning, and for the future social and professional lives of the students involved.

[1]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1993 .

[2]  Pamela A. Moss,et al.  Enlarging the Dialogue in Educational Measurement: Voices From Interpretive Research Traditions , 1996 .

[3]  Susan McLester,et al.  Technology Literacy and the MySpace Generation: They're Not Asking Permission. , 2007 .

[4]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Analyse des données qualitatives , 2003 .

[5]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[6]  M. Miles,et al.  Data management and analysis methods. , 1994 .

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[8]  K. Howe Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard , 1988 .

[9]  David R. Krathwohl,et al.  Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach , 1992 .

[10]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Alternative models for the use of multiple methods , 1987 .

[11]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Analyse des données qualitatives: recueil de nouvelles méthodes / , 1991 .

[12]  A. Hunter,et al.  Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles , 1989 .

[13]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[14]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[15]  J. V. D. Maren Méthodes de recherche pour l'éducation , 1997 .

[16]  R. Beck,et al.  Motivation: Theories and Principles , 1978 .

[17]  R. L'Écuyer Méthodologie de l'analyse développementale de contenu , 2011 .

[18]  Charles S. Reichardt,et al.  Taking uncertainty into account when estimating effects , 1987 .

[19]  M. Crotty The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[20]  Michelle Lessard-Hébert,et al.  La recherche qualitative ; Fondements et pratiques , 1995 .

[21]  R. Bogdan Qualitative research for education , 1981 .

[22]  A. Kamali,et al.  Social Research: Theory and Methods , 1991 .

[23]  R. Calfee Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[24]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .