Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff

[1] The spatial and temporal sources of headwater catchment runoff are poorly understood. We quantified the contributions of hillslopes and riparian zones to streamflow for two storm events in a highly responsive, steep, wet watershed located on the west coast of the South Island of New Zealand. We examined the spatial and temporal components of catchment storm flow using a simple continuity-based approach. We tested this with independent isotopic/solute mass balance hydrograph separation techniques. We monitored catchment runoff, internal hydrological response, isotopic, and solute dynamics at a trenched hillslope, and at hillslope and riparian positions in a 2.6-ha catchment. The gauged hillslope was used to isolate and quantify (by difference) riparian and hillslope zone contributions to the 2.6-ha headwater catchment. Utilizing flow-based approaches and a tracer-based mass balance mixing model, we found that hillslope runoff comprised 2–16% of total catchment storm runoff during a small 27-mm event and 47–55% during a larger 70-mm event. However, less than 4% of the new water collected at the catchment outlet originated from the hillslopes during each event. We found that in the 27-mm rain event, 84–97% of total storm runoff was generated in the riparian zone. In a larger 70-mm event, riparian water dominated total flow early in the event, although the hillslope became the main contributor once hillslope runoff was initiated. Despite the large amount of subsurface hillslope runoff in total storm runoff during the second larger event, riparian and channel zones accounted for 96% of the new water measured at the catchment outlet. Riparian water dominated between events, throughout small runoff events, and during early portions of large events. While this sequencing of catchment position contributions to flow has been conceptualized for some time, this is the first study to quantify this timing, constrained by hydrometric, isotopic, and solute approaches.

[1]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA) , 2001 .

[2]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  A Comparison of Chemical and Isotopic Hydrograph Separation , 1986 .

[3]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separation , 1990 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  A dynamic TOPMODEL , 2001 .

[5]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  Modeling transport of dissolved silica in a forested headwater catchment: Implications for defining the hydrochemical response of observed flow pathways , 2001 .

[6]  R. D. Black,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils , 1970 .

[7]  S. Schiff,et al.  Examining the contributions of glacial till water to storm runoff using two‐ and three‐component hydrograph separations , 1994 .

[8]  T. Moore,et al.  Dynamics of dissolved organic carbon in forested and disturbed catchments, Westland, New Zealand: 1. Maimai , 1989 .

[9]  J. Hewlett.  Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[10]  A. Becker,et al.  Disaggregation, aggregation and spatial scaling in hydrological modelling , 1999 .

[11]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[12]  K. Bencala,et al.  Response characteristics of DOC flushing in an alpine catchment , 1997 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Regulation of Nitrate‐N Release from Temperate Forests: A Test of the N Flushing Hypothesis , 1996 .

[14]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[15]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Modeling the spatial variability of subsurface runoff using a topographic index , 1997 .

[16]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[17]  K. N. Eshleman,et al.  The role of soil water in stormflow generation in a forested headwater catchment: synthesis of natural tracer and hydrometric evidence , 1994 .

[18]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  A review of the evolving perceptual model of hillslope flowpaths at the Maimai catchments, New Zealand , 2002 .

[19]  M. P. Mosley,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand , 1982 .

[20]  D. Weyman,et al.  THROUGHFLOW ON HILLSLOPES AND ITS RELATION TO THE STREAM HYDROGRAPH , 1970 .

[21]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[22]  R. Horton.  The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle , 1933 .

[23]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members ― an application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A. , 1990 .

[24]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  Distributed assessment of contributing area and riparian buffering along stream networks , 2003 .

[25]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Determination of the ground‐water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff , 1969 .

[26]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Comparison of hydrochemical tracers to estimate source contributions to peak flow in a small, forested, headwater catchment , 1998 .

[27]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics: Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology in the humid tropics , 2005 .

[28]  R. J. Avanzino,et al.  Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, California , 1986 .

[29]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: The use of principal components analysis for the end‐member mixing problem , 1992 .

[30]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members — A step towards second-generation acidification models , 1990 .

[31]  A. J. Pearce,et al.  Hydrology and related changes after harvesting native forest catchments and establishing pinus radiata plantations. Part 1. Introduction to study , 1994 .

[32]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology , 1998 .

[33]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics , 2003 .

[34]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[35]  M. Bonell,et al.  SELECTED CHALLENGES IN RUNOFF GENERATION RESEARCH IN FORESTS FROM THE HILLSLOPE TO HEADWATER DRAINAGE BASIN SCALE 1 , 1998 .

[36]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System - PRMS. , 1995 .

[37]  D. Genereux,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in tracer‐based hydrograph separations , 1998 .

[38]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A look inside ‘black box’ hydrograph separation models: a study at the Hydrohill catchment , 2001 .

[39]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Riparian zone flowpath dynamics during snowmelt in a small headwater catchment , 1999 .

[40]  R. Ragan.  An experimental investigation of partial area contribution. , 1968 .

[41]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[42]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  THROUGHFLOW, OVERLAND FLOW AND EROSION , 1967 .

[43]  A. Jenkins,et al.  Analysis of storm hydrograph and flow pathways using a three-component hydrograph separation model , 1993 .

[44]  J. Webster.  The hydrologic properties of the forest floor under beech/podocarp/hardwood forest, North Westland , 1977 .

[45]  M. Mosley.  Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[46]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[47]  J. Hewlett,et al.  Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage , 1963 .

[48]  R. Z. Whipkey.  SUBSURFACE STORMFLOW FROM FORESTED SLOPES , 1965 .

[49]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Flow Pathways on Steep Forested Hillslopes: the Tracer, Tensiometer and Trough Approach , 1998 .

[50]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Concentration‐discharge relationships in runoff from a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[51]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment , 1988 .

[52]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[53]  Rodger B. Grayson,et al.  Distributed parameter hydrologic modelling using vector elevation data: THALES and TAPES-C. , 1995 .

[54]  Jeff P. Raffensperger,et al.  Modelling transport of dissolved silica in a forested headwater catchment: the effect of hydrological and chemical time scales on hysteresis in the concentration–discharge relationship , 2001 .