Game-Theoretic Methods for Functional Response and Optimal Foraging Behavior

We develop a decision tree based game-theoretical approach for constructing functional responses in multi-prey/multi-patch environments and for finding the corresponding optimal foraging strategies. Decision trees provide a way to describe details of predator foraging behavior, based on the predator's sequence of choices at different decision points, that facilitates writing down the corresponding functional response. It is shown that the optimal foraging behavior that maximizes predator energy intake per unit time is a Nash equilibrium of the underlying optimal foraging game. We apply these game-theoretical methods to three scenarios: the classical diet choice model with two types of prey and sequential prey encounters, the diet choice model with simultaneous prey encounters, and a model in which the predator requires a positive recognition time to identify the type of prey encountered. For both diet choice models, it is shown that every Nash equilibrium yields optimal foraging behavior. Although suboptimal Nash equilibrium outcomes may exist when prey recognition time is included, only optimal foraging behavior is stable under evolutionary learning processes.

[1]  M. Johns,et al.  Average Renewal Loss Rates , 1963 .

[2]  S. Engen.  An Ecological Paradox: A Food Type May Become More Rare in the Diet as a Consequence of Being More Abundant , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[3]  R. Selten.  The chain store paradox , 1978 .

[4]  Jan Eisner,et al.  Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics III. , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  William A. Mitchell,et al.  Diet selection on depletable resources , 1989 .

[6]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Population Games And Evolutionary Dynamics , 2010, Economic learning and social evolution.

[7]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game , 1995 .

[8]  Eric L. Charnov,et al.  Optimal Foraging: Some Theoretical Explorations , 2006 .

[9]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Short-Term Apparent Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Resistance is useless?—Extensions to the game theory of kleptoparasitism , 2004, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[11]  A. Houston,et al.  Models of adaptive behaviour , 1999 .

[12]  József Garay,et al.  When is predator’s opportunism remunerative? , 2010 .

[13]  A. Wald.  On Cumulative Sums of Random Variables , 1944 .

[14]  L. Samuelson.  Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1997 .

[15]  Ross Cressman,et al.  The effects of opportunistic and intentional predators on the herding behavior of prey. , 2011, Ecology.

[16]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  The effect of costly information in diet choice , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[17]  D. Stephens,et al.  Preference and Profitability: Theory and Experiment , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. T. Erichsen,et al.  Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  V. Křivan,et al.  A mechanistic model for partial preferences. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary game theory , 1995, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Heithaus,et al.  Dangerous prey and daring predators: a review , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  P. Abrams,et al.  Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator–prey coevolution , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[25]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Optimal foraging and gut constraints: reconciling two schools of thought , 2005 .

[26]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the Theory of Optimal Diets , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[27]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology: Methods and Applications , 2001 .

[28]  E. Charnov.  Optimal Foraging: Attack Strategy of a Mantid , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[29]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[30]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Frequency-dependent payoffs and sequential decision-making favour consistent tactic use , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  M. Broom,et al.  Game-Theoretical Models in Biology , 2013 .

[33]  J. Garay,et al.  Optimal nutrient foraging strategy of an omnivore: Liebig's law determining numerical response. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  J. Fletcher.  Evolutionary Game Theory, Natural Selection, and Darwinian Dynamics , 2006, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[35]  C. Rechten,et al.  Optimal prey selection: Why do great tits show partial preferences? , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  V. Křivan,et al.  Optimal Foraging and Predator-Prey Dynamics , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[38]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  The Role of Foraging Time Constraints and Variable Prey Encounter in Optimal Diet Choice , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[39]  R. Selten.  Evolutionary stability in extensive two-person games , 1983 .

[40]  C. S. Holling.  The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density , 1966 .

[41]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Optimal Foraging and Cryptic Prey , 1980 .

[42]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[43]  R. Cressman.  Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games , 2003 .

[44]  H. Pulliam.  Diet Optimization with Nutrient Constraints , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[45]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Consumer-resource dynamics , 2003 .