Nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 strut subsidence after one-level corpectomy: underlying mechanism and effect on cervical neurological function

[1]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Long-term results of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 strut for cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  X. Ye,et al.  Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy. , 2015, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[3]  Xu Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Yueming Song,et al.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  F. La Marca,et al.  Radiological outcomes of static vs expandable titanium cages after corpectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis of subsidence. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Stott,et al.  Unipolar modular exeter hemiarthroplasty reduces length of stay and allows faster rehabilitation after hip fracture: a retrospective study of 117 patients , 2012 .

[7]  D. Jiang,et al.  A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy , 2012, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Yan,et al.  Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cage and dynamic cervical plate for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly osteoporosis patients , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[9]  Young-su Park,et al.  Complications and Long-Term Follow-Up Results in Titanium Mesh Cage Reconstruction After Cervical Corpectomy , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  A. Mannion,et al.  Titanium mesh cages (TMC) in spine surgery , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[11]  W. Jie,et al.  Tissue engineering scaffold material of nano-apatite crystals and polyamide composite , 2004 .

[12]  K. Shigenobu,et al.  Pitfalls of Anterior Cervical Fusion Using Titanium Mesh and Local Autograft , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[13]  P. Narotam,et al.  Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy: a clinical and radiological study. , 2003, Journal of Neurosurgery.

[14]  T. Albert,et al.  Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Crest Bone Harvest for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[15]  Yubao Li,et al.  Development of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(hexamethylene adipamide) composites. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[16]  Kelly M Malloy,et al.  Autograft versus Allograft in Degenerative Cervical Disease , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  L. Lenke,et al.  Analysis of Titanium Mesh Cages in Adults With Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up , 2000, Spine.

[18]  Cloward Rb.  The anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine: the cloward procedure: past, present, and future ― The presidential guest lecture, cervical spine research society , 1988 .

[19]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  F. Eismont,et al.  Surgical techniques of anterior decompression and fusion for spinal cord injuries. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.