Analysis of a statistically initialized fuzzy logic scheme for classifying the severity of convective storms in Finland

This paper proposes a method for classifying the severity of individual convective storms with real-time weather radar and lightning location data. The algorithm is based on a statistically initialized fuzzy logic model with human-oriented linguistic inference rules. When combined with an object-oriented convective storm tracking algorithm, the severity classification uses the past severity values in addition to the current state of the storm. Furthermore, the proposed method can be customized to correspond to the user-specific needs of different end user groups. The membership functions of the fuzzy logic model are initialized using the statistical analysis of various storm attributes derived from radar and lightning data, which potentially allows the adaptation of the model to different climates. The statistically initialized severity classification is also stable with respect to systematic errors in the measurements. To adjust the model to the Finnish climate, approximately 40 000 storms were tracked with a weather radar-based object-oriented convective storm tracking algorithm. The tracking was performed over a relatively large study area, with the composite of eight C-band weather radars, enabling also the analysis of relatively long-lived intense storms, such as mesoscale convective systems. In addition, the presented work illustrates the statistical characteristics of convective storms in Finland. The study also discusses the importance of careful data quality control when conducting a statistical analysis with an object-oriented storm tracking algorithm. Copyright © 2013 Royal Meteorological Society

[1]  Lei Han,et al.  3D Convective Storm Identification, Tracking, and Forecasting—An Enhanced TITAN Algorithm , 2009 .

[2]  David B. Wolff,et al.  General Probability-matched Relations between Radar Reflectivity and Rain Rate , 1993 .

[3]  R. G. Baughman,et al.  Hail and Lightning Occurrence in Mountain Thunderstorms , 1970 .

[4]  Antti Mäkelä,et al.  Real-Time Hazard Approximation of Long-Lasting Convective Storms Using Emergency Data , 2013 .

[5]  Jan Handwerker,et al.  Cell tracking with TRACE3D—a new algorithm , 2002 .

[6]  Rita D. Roberts,et al.  A Proposed Microburst Nowcasting Procedure Using Single-Doppler Radar , 1989 .

[7]  Yinjing Lin,et al.  Statistic characteristics of severe convective storm during Warm-Season in the Beijing-Tianjin region and its vicinity , 2009 .

[8]  Antti Mäkelä,et al.  The Daily Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flash Density in the Contiguous United States and Finland , 2011 .

[9]  Nan Li,et al.  A new radar‐based storm identification and warning technique , 2012 .

[10]  P. Marcacci,et al.  Thunderstorm nowcasting by means of lightning and radar data: algorithms and applications in northern Italy , 2008 .

[11]  Antti Mäkelä,et al.  A decade of high‐latitude lightning location: Effects of the evolving location network in Finland , 2010 .

[12]  John K. Williams,et al.  Introduction to Fuzzy Logic , 2009 .

[13]  P. M. Austin,et al.  Relation between Measured Radar Reflectivity and Surface Rainfall , 1987 .

[14]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Nowcasting Thunderstorms: A Status Report , 1998 .

[15]  M. Dixon,et al.  TITAN: Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis, and Nowcasting—A Radar-based Methodology , 1993 .

[16]  Arthur Witt,et al.  The National Severe Storms Laboratory Tornado Detection Algorithm , 1998 .

[17]  Lans P. Rothfusz,et al.  Warning Operations in Support of the 1996 Centennial Olympic Games , 2000 .

[18]  Wayne E. McGovern,et al.  The WSR-88D Severe Weather Potential Algorithm , 1995 .

[19]  Harri Hohti,et al.  Operational Measurement of Precipitation in Cold Climates , 2004 .

[20]  Ari-Juhani Punkka,et al.  Occurrence of Summertime Convective Precipitation and Mesoscale Convective Systems in Finland during 2000–01 , 2005 .

[21]  Laurent Delobbe,et al.  Statistical Characteristics of Convective Storms in Belgium Derived from Volumetric Weather Radar Observations , 2013 .

[22]  Thomas Hengstebeck,et al.  Automated Processing of Doppler Radar Data for Severe Weather Warnings , 2012 .

[23]  Greg Stumpf,et al.  The S2K Severe weather detection algorithms and their performance , 2004 .

[24]  A. Waldvogel,et al.  Criteria for the Detection of Hail Cells , 1979 .

[25]  Micha Werner,et al.  Understanding the Value of Radar Rainfall Nowcasts in Flood Forecasting and Warning in Flashy Catchments , 2009 .

[26]  Shannon A. Dulin,et al.  A damaging downburst prediction and detection algorithm for the WSR-88D , 2004 .

[27]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm , 1998 .

[28]  Nadav Peleg,et al.  Convective rain cells: Radar-derived spatiotemporal characteristics and synoptic patterns over the eastern Mediterranean , 2012 .

[29]  Roberto Cremonini,et al.  Radar-Based Analysis of Convective Storms over Northwestern Italy , 2011 .

[30]  David M. Schultz,et al.  Severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings in Europe , 2009 .

[31]  Johann Riedl,et al.  Systematic variations of Z–R-relationships from drop size distributions measured in northern Germany during seven years , 1998 .

[32]  A. Witt,et al.  An Enhanced Hail Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D , 1998 .

[33]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  The Warning Decision Support System–Integrated Information , 2007 .

[34]  Iwan Holleman,et al.  Uncertainties in radar echo top heights used for hail detection , 2006 .

[35]  Harri Hohti,et al.  Quality assurance in the FMI Doppler Weather Radar Network , 2010 .

[36]  Raúl E. López,et al.  Lightning Casualties and Damages in the United States from 1959 to 1994 , 2000 .

[37]  Ebrahim H. Mamdani,et al.  An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Arthur Witt,et al.  The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking Algorithm: An Enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm , 1998 .

[39]  David P. Yorty,et al.  WHERE ARE THE MOST INTENSE THUNDERSTORMS ON EARTH , 2006 .

[40]  Steven Businger,et al.  Relationships among Lightning, Precipitation, and Hydrometeor Characteristics over the North Pacific Ocean* , 2009 .

[41]  Eugenio Gorgucci,et al.  Evaluation of Attenuation Correction Methodology for Dual-Polarization Radars: Application to X-Band Systems , 2005 .

[42]  Terri Betancourt,et al.  NCAR Auto-Nowcast System , 2003 .

[43]  Timothy J. Smyth,et al.  Correction for attenuation of radar reflectivity using polarization data , 1998 .

[44]  I Holleman,et al.  Development of a hail-detection-product , 2000 .

[45]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Precipitation Measurement and Hydrology , 1990 .

[46]  I. Zawadzki,et al.  Reflectivity-Rain Rate Relationships for Radar Hydrology in Brazil , 1987 .

[47]  Petr Novák,et al.  CELLTRACK ― Convective cell tracking algorithm and its use for deriving life cycle characteristics , 2009 .

[48]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[49]  E. Williams,et al.  The Electrification of Severe Storms , 2001 .

[50]  Herb A. Winston,et al.  Evaluation of RADAP II Severe-Storm-Detection Algorithms , 1986 .

[51]  U. Germann,et al.  MAP D-PHASE: Real-Time Demonstration of Weather Forecast Quality in the Alpine region , 2009 .

[52]  J. G. Galway,et al.  The evolution of severe thunderstorm criteria within the weather service , 1989 .

[53]  Donald W. Burgess,et al.  Developing Tools for Nowcasting Storm Severity , 2006 .

[54]  N. Arnell,et al.  Hydrology and global environmental change , 2002 .

[55]  Peter T. May,et al.  The statistical characteristics of convective cells in a monsoon regime (Darwin, Northern Australia) , 2007 .

[56]  Robert Crane,et al.  Automatic Cell Detection and Tracking , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[57]  John Bally,et al.  The Thunderstorm Interactive Forecast System: Turning Automated Thunderstorm Tracks into Severe Weather Warnings , 2004 .