Multi-timescale and multi-objective power dispatch strategy incorporating air pollutant temporal and spatial distribution control

Abstract Most existing environmental/economic dispatch power dispatch studies only focus on emission minimization. However, air pollutant temporal and spatial distribution (APTSD) control which considers atmospheric dispersion would be more effective, in terms of air pollution mitigation. This paper proposes a power dispatch strategy which incorporates APTSD and stimulates the potential of atmospheric environment capacity (AEC). Firstly, an APTSD model is constructed to help system operators understand how thermal power generation influences the ground level concentration (GLC), which considers the diurnal variation of the atmospheric boundary layer. Then, a multi-timescale framework is developed to accommodate the variability and uncertainty of meteorological conditions. A day-ahead sub-model and an intraday sub-model are integrated, which reduce generation cost (GC), emission of carbon dioxide (EC), and implement APTSD control of sulfur dioxide simultaneously. In particular, the AEC margin for TPPs is fully exploited to extract compromise solution, realizing a dynamic trade-off between different objectives. Case studies are first conducted on an IEEE 39 model, demonstrating that the use of AECM can reduce total GC and EC by 2.54% and 5.36% respectively, with the same power demands being satisfied and a better air quality. Advantages of the proposed APTSD strategy over the traditional emission reduction strategy are further demonstrated by practical application, which shows that not only is the average GLC reduced by 19.16%, but also the total GC and total EC are reduced by 107,460 dollars and 1450 tons, respectively.

[1]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A Memetic Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Method for Environmental Power Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Hao Wang,et al.  Dynamic environmental economic dispatch using multiobjective differential evolution algorithm with expanded double selection and adaptive random restart , 2013 .

[3]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[4]  Tao Yu,et al.  Dynamic leader based collective intelligence for maximum power point tracking of PV systems affected by partial shading condition , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[5]  Huanran Dong,et al.  Optimal design of integrated energy system considering economics, autonomy and carbon emissions , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Qinghua Wu,et al.  Nonlinear maximum power point tracking control and modal analysis of DFIG based wind turbine , 2016 .

[7]  P. Zannetti Air Pollution Modeling: "Theories, Computational Methods And Available Software" , 2013 .

[8]  Yong Li,et al.  Hourly PM2.5 concentration forecast using stacked autoencoder model with emphasis on seasonality , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Tao Yu,et al.  Grouped grey wolf optimizer for maximum power point tracking of doubly-fed induction generator based wind turbine , 2017 .

[10]  Kai Liu,et al.  Unit Commitment Incorporating Spatial Distribution Control of Air Pollutant Dispersion , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[11]  Jun Dong,et al.  Robust sliding-mode control of wind energy conversion systems for optimal power extraction via nonlinear perturbation observers , 2018 .

[12]  J. R. Eagleman,et al.  Air Pollution Meteorology , 1991 .

[13]  J. C. R. Hunt,et al.  Diffusion in the Stable Boundary Layer , 1984 .

[14]  Li-Chiu Chang,et al.  Explore a deep learning multi-output neural network for regional multi-step-ahead air quality forecasts , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[15]  Prakash Kumar Hota,et al.  Economic emission load dispatch through fuzzy based bacterial foraging algorithm , 2010 .

[16]  Lizhong Xu,et al.  A Multi Time-Scale and Multi Energy-Type Coordinated Microgrid Scheduling Solution—Part I: Model and Methodology , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Determining optimal fuel mix for environmental dispatch , 1974 .

[18]  Tao Yu,et al.  Consensus Transfer ${Q}$ -Learning for Decentralized Generation Command Dispatch Based on Virtual Generation Tribe , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[19]  Tao Yu,et al.  Passivity-based sliding-mode control design for optimal power extraction of a PMSG based variable speed wind turbine , 2018 .

[20]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Air quality impacts of power plant emissions in Beijing. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[21]  Tao Yu,et al.  Novel bio-inspired memetic salp swarm algorithm and application to MPPT for PV systems considering partial shading condition , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  Yejing Zhou,et al.  Urban atmospheric environmental capacity and atmospheric environmental carrying capacity constrained by GDP–PM 2.5 , 2017 .

[23]  Mahmood Joorabian,et al.  Emission, reserve and economic load dispatch problem with non-smooth and non-convex cost functions using epsilon-multi-objective genetic algorithm variable , 2013 .

[24]  Tao Yu,et al.  Lifelong Learning for Complementary Generation Control of Interconnected Power Grids With High-Penetration Renewables and EVs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Ferial El-Hawary,et al.  A summary of environmental/economic dispatch algorithms , 1994 .

[26]  Kai-Ching Chu,et al.  An approach to on-line power dispatch with ambient air pollution constraints , 1977 .

[27]  F. L. Ludwig,et al.  Simplification of a gaussian puff model for real-time minicomputer use , 1977 .

[28]  Ying Chen,et al.  Short-Term Load Forecasting: Similar Day-Based Wavelet Neural Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.