Sustainability assessment of dwellings – a comparison of methodologies

ABSTRACT Building sustainability assessment tools (BSATs) aim to promote and rank the sustainability of building stock. This paper makes a deep comparative analysis on how dwellings are evaluated by five BSAT and one performance-based design tool. The comparison is based on: (i) the purpose of assessment; (ii) sustainability dimensions considered; (iii) indicators addressed; (iv) life cycle phases considered by the indicators; (v) type of indicators; (vi) measurements; (vii) aggregation processes; and (vii) life cycle phases during which the assessment was carried out. The evaluation showed that the scope of BSAT varies significantly as well as the life cycle phases addressed in the assessment. Financial issues are often excluded from the assessment. None of the schemes is totally quantitative or qualitative in their measurement system; all have different types of indicators and different ways to assess them. This research provides researchers and stakeholders with important inside knowledge on the tools that allow the development and construction of more sustainable buildings.

[1]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool development approach , 2012 .

[2]  W. Smith Developing Indicators of ‘Sustainability’ , 2002 .

[3]  Chris Pyke,et al.  Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation , 2013 .

[4]  Ulrich Bogenstätter,et al.  Prediction and optimization of life-cycle costs in early design , 2000 .

[5]  Tran Huu Tuan,et al.  Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage , 2008 .

[6]  John M. Quigley,et al.  The Economics of Green Building , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  David Root,et al.  Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment , 2006 .

[8]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Survey of Sustainable Building Design Practices in North America, Europe, and Asia , 2006 .

[9]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[10]  Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik,et al.  A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects , 2014 .

[11]  S. R. Chandratilake,et al.  Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations , 2013 .

[12]  Francis W.H. Yik,et al.  On the study of the credit-weighting scale in a building environmental assessment scheme , 2002 .

[13]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Sustainability assessment and standardisation : steel buildings , 2012 .

[14]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method and simulation program informed decisions in the early stages of building design , 2010 .

[15]  Walid Tizani,et al.  BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual steel design , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[16]  CB RICHARD ELLIS WHO PAYS FOR GREEN? THE ECONOMICS OF SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS , 2009 .

[17]  W. L. Lee,et al.  A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes , 2013 .

[18]  Jerome Billeter BREEAM: the Environmental Assessment Method for Buildings Around The World , 2009 .

[19]  Tarja Häkkinen Sustainability and performance assessment and benchmarking of buildings: Final report , 2012 .

[20]  U. Berardi Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings , 2012 .

[21]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Cost-optimum analysis of building fabric renovation in a Swedish multi-story residential building , 2014 .

[22]  Karin Ibenholt,et al.  Economic impacts of cultural heritage – Research and perspectives , 2009 .

[23]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  J. B. Andrade,et al.  Early Stage Design Decisions: The Way to Achieve Sustainable Buildings at Lower Costs , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[25]  Maria de Fatima,et al.  A critical analysis of building sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildings , 2014 .

[26]  Nasim Ahmed,et al.  SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURAL DESIGN , 2012 .

[27]  Enrico De Angelis,et al.  Research of Economic Sustainability of Different Energy Refurbishment Strategies for an Apartment Block Building , 2014 .

[28]  Manuela Guedes de Almeida,et al.  Analysis of some Portuguese thermal regulation parameters , 2013 .

[29]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience , 1998 .

[30]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of Portuguese buildings , 2008 .

[31]  José Amarilio Barbosa,et al.  Adaptation of SBToolPT to office buildings , 2013 .

[32]  Marita Wallhagen,et al.  Framework for Detailed Comparison of Building Environmental Assessment Tools , 2013 .

[33]  Emily M. Rauch,et al.  Sustainable Building Rating Systems Summary , 2006 .

[34]  Ahmad Jrade,et al.  Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage , 2013 .

[35]  Arazi Idrus,et al.  Best Practice Criteria for Sustainable Maintenance Management of Heritage Buildings in Malaysia , 2014 .

[36]  R Rijk Blok,et al.  General framework for sustainability evaluation of the built environment , 2012 .

[37]  Mathias Borg,et al.  Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services: today practice and development needs , 2003 .

[38]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  A Swedish environmental rating tool for buildings , 2011 .

[39]  Iva Kovacic,et al.  Building life cycle optimization tools for early design phases , 2015 .