Efficient Simulation of Financial Stress Testing Scenarios with Suppes-Bayes Causal Networks

Abstract The most recent financial upheavals have cast doubt on the adequacy of some of the conventional quantitative risk management strategies, such as VaR (Value at Risk), in many common situations. Consequently, there has been an increasing need for verisimilar financial stress testings, namely simulating and analyzing financial portfolios in extreme, albeit rare scenarios. Unlike conventional risk management which exploits statistical correlations among financial instruments, here we focus our analysis on the notion of probabilistic causation, which is embodied by Suppes-Bayes Causal Networks (SBCNs), SBCNs are probabilistic graphical models that have many attractive features in terms of more accurate causal analysis for generating financial stress scenarios. In this paper, we present a novel approach for conducting stress testing of financial portfolios based on SBCNs in combination with classical machine learning classification tools. The resulting method is shown to be capable of correctly discovering the causal relationships among financial factors that affect the portfolios and thus, simulating stress testing scenarios with a higher accuracy and lower computational complexity than conventional Monte Carlo Simulations.

[1]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[2]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[3]  Samik Raychaudhuri,et al.  Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[4]  Francesco Bonchi,et al.  Exposing the probabilistic causal structure of discrimination , 2015, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics.

[5]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Inferring Tree Causal Models of Cancer Progression with Probability Raising , 2013, bioRxiv.

[6]  E. Fama,et al.  Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies , 1996 .

[7]  Marco Scutari,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package , 2009, 0908.3817.

[8]  Nicholas Eriksson,et al.  Conjunctive Bayesian networks , 2006, math/0608417.

[9]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools , 2005 .

[10]  B. Efron Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods , 1981 .

[11]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  A survey of decision tree classifier methodology , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  K. Pearson Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs , 1897, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[13]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  CAPRI: Efficient Inference of Cancer Progression Models from Cross-sectional Data , 2014, bioRxiv.

[14]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Algorithmic methods to infer the evolutionary trajectories in cancer progression , 2015 .