A goal-programming enhanced collaborative optimization approach to reducing lifecyle costs for naval vessels

Understanding the trade-offs involved in assessing lifetime cost for engineering systems requires understanding trends in various engineering disciplines that require significantly different analysis methods to efficiently explore. The corresponding design spaces can be flat, defined by weak minima, and thus difficult to understand using traditixonal optimization methods. This paper presents a new multi-disciplinary framework that uses a goal-programming enhanced multi-objective collaborative optimization (eMOCO) approach to facilitate the development of the spaces. In order to further increase its efficiency in discrete or flat spaces well-suited to evolutionary optimization a unique discipline level genetic algorithm is proposed. Naval vessels are an example of an engineering system that has a difficult design space with respect to lifetime cost, however, one where it is critical to understand. As these costs are increasing, they are becoming limiting factors in a vessel’s operational life. Though they are so important, the interaction between different cost categories such as production and operation has not been explored in depth and is not always clear. Understanding the trade-offs between different aspects of a vessel’s total ownership costs early in the design stage can aid in the production of new ships where they are minimized. The proposed framework is verified on mathematical problems, and then used to develop trade-spaces between resistance and production for a nominal naval combatant vessel. These trade-spaces show both the knowledge gained by designers in understanding these trade-offs and the ability of the proposed eMOCO framework to develop them effectively.

[1]  F. Bennis,et al.  Collaborative Optimization Strategy for Multi-Objective Design , 2005 .

[2]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Multi-Disciplinary Optimization for Multi-Objective Uncertainty Design of Thin Walled Beams , 2010 .

[3]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[4]  Jin Wu,et al.  Quality-Assisted Multi-Objective Multidisciplinary Genetic Algorithms , 2002 .

[5]  Patrick Siarry,et al.  Three new metrics to measure the convergence of metaheuristics towards the Pareto frontier and the aesthetic of a set of solutions in biobjective optimization , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe-Ming Yang,et al.  Optimization of corrugated bulkhead forms by genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Nickolas Vlahopoulos,et al.  An integrated multidisciplinary particle swarm optimization approach to conceptual ship design , 2010 .

[10]  Vikrant Aute,et al.  A Genetic Algorithms Based Approach for Multidisciplinary Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization , 2006 .

[11]  Karl H. Frank,et al.  Optimal inspection scheduling of steel bridges using nondestructive testing techniques , 2006 .

[12]  Matthew Collette,et al.  Optimization of structural design to minimize lifetime maintenance cost of a naval vessel , 2013 .

[13]  Armin W. Troesch,et al.  Conceptual design and hydrodynamic analysis of a high-speed sealift adjustable-length trimaran , 2009 .

[14]  Shari E. Hannapel,et al.  Development of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Algorithms for Ship Design Under Uncertainty. , 2012 .

[15]  I. E. Winkle,et al.  Towards a Method for the Optimisation of Midship Section in Terms of Production Cost in Preliminary Ship Design , 2005 .

[16]  J B Caldwell,et al.  SHIP STRUCTURES: IMPROVEMENT BY RATIONAL DESIGN OPTIMISATION , 1995 .

[17]  Fan Zijie,et al.  Multi-Objective Collaborative Optimization Based on Evolutionary Algorithms , 2011 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[19]  E. O. Tuck The wave resistance formula of J.H. Michell (1898) and Its significance to recent research in ship hydrodynamics , 1989 .

[20]  Matthew Collette,et al.  Understanding the Trade-offs Between Producibility and Resistance for Differing Vessels and Missions , 2016 .

[21]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Optimal maintenance policy for permanently monitored infrastructure subjected to extreme events , 2013 .

[22]  Ebru Sarıöz An optimization approach for fairing of ship hull forms , 2006 .

[23]  W P Krol MIDSHIP SECTION DESIGN USING A BILEVEL PRODUCTION COST OPTIMIZATION SCHEME , 1991 .

[24]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Inspection and monitoring planning for RC structures based on minimization of expected damage detection delay , 2011 .

[25]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Ultimate Strength of Aluminum Plates and Stiffened Panels for Marine Applications , 2004 .