An ultrasound study of contextual and syllabic effects in consonant sequences produced under heavy articulatory constraint conditions

Abstract The present ultrasound study investigates lingual coarticulatory resistance and differences in tongue configuration and contextual variability for consonants in syllable onset vs coda position in Catalan /iC#Ci/ sequences. In agreement with comparable ultrasound data for /aC#Ca/ sequences reported in an earlier study, coarticulatory resistance turned out to be less for /r/ (which is realized as a trill in onset position and exhibits a more tap-like realization in coda position), /l/ (which is not strongly dark), /s/ and the alveolopalatal /ɲ/ than for /p, t, n, k/. As expected, contextual variability was less for /iC#Ci/ than for /aC#Ca/ sequences due to the highly demanding requirements put on the tongue body by the high front vowel. Regarding the syllable-position-dependent differences, consonants were often longer but not less variable articulatorily in syllable initial than syllable final position. Syllable-position differences in lingual configuration could be ascribed to either a trend for consonants to be more prominent in onset vs coda position or to prominent coarticulatory effects from flanking /i/ rather than from the contextual consonant in the cluster. The conclusion is drawn that the reason why consonants may sound more reduced in coda vs onset position in heterosyllabic clusters is due less to their actual lingual configuration than to their being manifestly shorter and to specific production characteristics which depend not only on the upper articulators but on the jaw cycle as well.

[1]  Tamara Rathcke,et al.  ARTICULATORY STRENGTHENING IN INITIAL GERMAN /kl/ CLUSTERS UNDER PROSODIC VARIATION , 2007 .

[2]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  Lingual kinematics and coarticulation for alveolopalatal and velar consonants in Catalan. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Phil Hoole,et al.  The coarticulation/invariance scale: mutual information as a measure of coarticulation resistance, motor synergy, and articulatory invariance. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences , 1996 .

[5]  R L Diehl,et al.  On the Role of Perception in Shaping Phonological Assimilation Rules , 1992, Language and speech.

[6]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics – the interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures , 2010 .

[7]  C. Geng,et al.  Timing of German onset and word boundary clusters , 2014 .

[8]  J. Ohala,et al.  Coarticulation and Phonology , 1993, Language and speech.

[9]  C A Fowler,et al.  Coordination and Coarticulation in Speech Production , 1993, Language and speech.

[10]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  The effect of syllable position on consonant reduction (evidence from Catalan consonant clusters) , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[11]  D. Recasens,et al.  An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Lisa Davidson.  Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  A study on coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for front lingual consonants and vowels using ultrasound , 2016, J. Phonetics.

[14]  William J. Hardcastle,et al.  Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences , 1985, Speech Commun..

[15]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  Contextual and syllabic effects in heterosyllabic consonant sequences. An ultrasound study , 2018, Speech Commun..

[16]  R. Krakow.  Physiological organization of syllables: a review , 1999 .

[17]  Jeff Mielke.  An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  Coarticulation, assimilation and blending in Catalan consonant clusters , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[19]  J. Ohala,et al.  Prosodic phonology and phonetics , 1984, Phonology Yearbook.

[20]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation , 1993 .

[21]  P. Keating,et al.  Word-level asymmetries in consonant articulation , 2001 .

[22]  Maria-Josep Solé,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[23]  Melissa A. Redford,et al.  The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  P. Hoole,et al.  Intrinsic and Prosodic Effects on Articulatory Coordination in Initial Consonant Clusters , 2009 .

[25]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Gestural overlap and recoverability: articulatory evidence from Georgian , 2001 .

[27]  Jason Adams,et al.  Interacting effects of syllable and phrase position on consonant articulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Stefan A. Frisch,et al.  Anticipatory coarticulation and stability of speech in typically fluent speakers and people who stutter , 2016, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[29]  Per Lindblad,et al.  [l] tends to be velarised, apical as opposed to laminal, and produced with a low jaw, and these features are connected , 2003 .