Skin sensitization

Skin sensitization associated with allergic contact dermatitis is a common health problem and is an important consideration for toxicologists in safety assessment. Historically, in vivo predictive tests have been used with good success to identify substances that have the potential to induce skin sensitization, and these tests formed the basis of safety evaluation. These original tests are now being replaced gradually either by in vitro assays or by further refinements of in vivo methods such as the local lymph node assay. Human data have also been available to inform classification decisions for some substances and have been used by risk managers to introduce measures for exposure reduction. However, humans encounter hazards in the context of exposure rather than in the form of intrinsic hazards per se, and so in this article, we have examined critically the extent to which human data have been used to refine classification decisions and safety evaluations. We have also evaluated information on the burden of human allergic skin disease and used this to address the question of whether, and to what extent, the identification and evaluation of skin sensitization hazards has led to an improvement of public and/or occupational health.

[1]  A. Kligman The identification of contact allergens by human assay. I. A critique of standard methods. , 1966, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  D. Basketter,et al.  Why does allergic contact dermatitis exist? , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  A. Schnuch,et al.  10‐year prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Denmark estimated through the CE‐DUR method , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  D. Buckley,et al.  The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch‐test population over a 17‐year period , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  A. Barbaud,et al.  [Changes in the European baseline series from 1981 to 2011 in a French dermatology-allergology centre]. , 2013, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[6]  D A Basketter,et al.  Skin sensitization--a critical review of predictive test methods in animals and man. , 1991, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  D. Basketter,et al.  In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers. , 2013, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[8]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[9]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment , 1997 .

[10]  H Löffler,et al.  [Irritant contact dermatitis]. , 2000, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[11]  T. Hartung,et al.  Toward an evidence-based dermatotoxicology , 2012 .

[12]  D. Basketter,et al.  Skin irritation, false positives and the local lymph node assay: a guideline issue? , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  A. Barbaud,et al.  Évolution de la batterie standard européenne de 1981 à 2011 dans un centre de dermato-allergologie français , 2013 .

[14]  J. Thyssen,et al.  Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007 * , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  山上 鋭享 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) 化学品の分類および表示に関する世界調和システム , 2007 .

[16]  H. Maibach,et al.  Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  I. Kimber,et al.  Correlation of contact sensitizer potency with T cell frequency and TCR repertoire diversity. , 2014, Experientia supplementum.

[18]  J. Johansen,et al.  Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy – a growing epidemic , 2013, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  Frank Gerberick,et al.  The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug‐utilization research (CE‐DUR) approach , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  Silvia Casati,et al.  The regulatory use of the Local Lymph Node Assay for the notification of new chemicals in Europe. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  H. Maibach,et al.  Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[23]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective , 2006, Human & experimental toxicology.

[24]  M. Weber European Communities , 1959, International Organization.

[25]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010 , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[26]  Torkil Menné,et al.  The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals Part I , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[27]  J. W. Weyland,et al.  Kathon CG: a review. , 1988, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[28]  D. Holness Recent advances in occupational dermatitis , 2013, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[29]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Contact allergy to the active ingredients of Kathon CG in the guinea pig. , 1987, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[30]  A. Boman,et al.  Guinea pig maximization test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[31]  E. Rudner North American Group results. , 1977, Contact dermatitis.

[32]  E. Epstein Manual of Contact Dermatitis , 1976 .

[33]  Aynur Aptula,et al.  Local Lymph Node Data for the Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternatives: A Second Compilation , 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[34]  I Gerner,et al.  Chemical substances and contact allergy--244 substances ranked according to allergenic potency. , 2003, Toxicology.

[35]  H. Maibach,et al.  Occupational Contact Dermatitis: Clinical and Chemical Aspects , 1982 .

[36]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Application of a weight of evidence approach to assessing discordant sensitisation datasets: implications for REACH. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[37]  Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin,et al.  The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals Part II , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[38]  A. Dirksen,et al.  Incidence of allergic contact sensitization in Danish adults between 1990 and 1998; the Copenhagen Allergy Study, Denmark , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[39]  A. Kligman The identification of contact allergens by human assay. II. Factors influencing the induction and measurement of allergic contact dermatitis. , 1966, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[40]  D. Basketter,et al.  In Vitro Approaches to the Identification and Characterization of Skin Sensitizers , 2007 .

[41]  M. Flyvholm,et al.  Occupational irritant contact dermatitis diagnosed by analysis of contact irritants and allergens in the work environment , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[42]  D. Basketter Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: skin sensitization and quantitative risk assessment , 2010, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[43]  T. Menné,et al.  Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. , 1992, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[44]  L. Naldi,et al.  Design and Feasibility of an International Study Assessing the Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Fragrances in the General Population: The European Dermato-Epidemiology Network Fragrance Study , 2010, Dermatology.

[45]  L. Naldi,et al.  Prevalence of self-reported skin complaints and avoidance of common daily life consumer products in selected European Regions. , 2014, JAMA dermatology.

[46]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[47]  J. Nicolas,et al.  T cell responses to contact allergens. , 2014, Experientia supplementum.

[48]  David Basketter,et al.  Predictive Tests for Irritants and Allergens and Their Use in Quantitative Risk Assessment , 2011 .

[49]  S. Felter,et al.  Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure‐based risk assessment approach , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[50]  Earl J. Runder North American Group Results , 1977 .

[51]  K. Zug,et al.  Fragrance allergic contact dermatitis. , 2014, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[52]  N. Meyer,et al.  Outbreak of contact sensitization to methylisothiazolinone: an analysis of French data from the REVIDAL‐GERDA network , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[53]  I. Merfort,et al.  In vitro and in vivo analysis of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory effects of weak and strong contact allergens , 2010, Experimental dermatology.

[54]  A. Ruszkowski Patch testing. , 2005, Dermatology nursing.

[55]  D A Basketter,et al.  Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. , 1994, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[56]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[57]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[58]  D. Basketter,et al.  Diagnostic patch testing—does it have a wider relevance? , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[59]  Gavin Maxwell,et al.  From pathways to people: applying the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization to risk assessment. , 2013, ALTEX.

[60]  D. Basketter,et al.  Consideration of criteria required for assignment of a (skin) sensitiser a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[61]  E. Warshaw,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2009 to 2010 , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.