Progressive failure simulation in laminated composites under fatigue loading by using discrete damage modeling

The discrete damage modeling method is extended for progressive failure analysis in laminated composites under fatigue loading. Discrete damage modeling uses the regularized extended finite element method for the simulation of matrix cracking at initially unknown locations and directions independent of the mesh orientation. A material history variable in each integration point is introduced and updated after each loading increment, corresponding to certain load amplitude and number of cycles. The accumulation of the material history variable is governed by Palmgren-Miner’s rule. Cohesive zones associated with mesh-independent cracks are inserted when the material history parameter reaches the value of 1. Cohesive zone model consistently describing crack initiation and propagation under fatigue loading without any assumption of initial crack size is proposed. The fatigue properties required for matrix failure prediction include shear and tensile S-N curves as well as Mode I and II Paris law parameters. Tensile fiber failure is assumed unaffected by fatigue. All input data required for model application are directly measured by ASTM tests except tensile fiber scaling parameter and compression fiber failure fracture toughness, which were taken from literature sources. The model contains no internal calibration parameters. Fatigue damage extent, stiffness degradation and residual tensile and compressive strength of IM7/977-3 laminates have been evaluated. Three different layups, [0/45/90/-45]2S, [30/60/90/-60/-30]2S and [60/0/-60]3S, were modeled and tested. The predictions captured most experimental trends and showed good agreement with X-ray CT damage assessment; however, significant further work is required to develop reliable methodology for quantitative composite durability prediction.

[1]  S. Clay,et al.  Experimental results of fatigue testing for calibration and validation of composite progressive damage analysis methods , 2017 .

[2]  Endel Iarve,et al.  Static strength prediction in laminated composites by using discrete damage modeling , 2017 .

[3]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  Assessment of Composite Damage Growth Tools for Aircraft Structure Part I , 2015 .

[4]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Failure Models and Criteria for Frp Under In-Plane or Three-Dimensional Stress States Including Shear Non-Linearity , 2013 .

[5]  Gretchen B. Murri,et al.  Evaluation of Delamination Onset and Growth Characterization Methods Under Mode I Fatigue Loading , 2013 .

[6]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials , 2012 .

[7]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  Simulation of discrete damage in composite Overheight Compact Tension specimens , 2012 .

[8]  Michael W. Czabaj,et al.  A Test for Characterizing Delamination Migration in Carbon/Epoxy Tape Laminates , 2012 .

[9]  Endel Iarve,et al.  Mesh‐independent matrix cracking and delamination modeling in laminated composites , 2011 .

[10]  R. Brockman,et al.  Strength Prediction in Open Hole Composite Laminates by Using Discrete Damage Modeling , 2011 .

[11]  S. Hallett,et al.  A combined model for initiation and propagation of damage under fatigue loading for cohesive interface elements , 2010 .

[12]  W. Johnston,et al.  Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Characterization of a Graphite Epoxy Composite Material , 2010 .

[13]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  A fatigue degradation law for cohesive interface elements – Development and application to composite materials , 2010 .

[14]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Simulation of delamination in composites under high-cycle fatigue , 2007 .

[15]  B. Dopker,et al.  Interlaminar Fatigue Elements for Crack Growth Based On Virtual Crack Closure Technique , 2007 .

[16]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading , 2006 .

[17]  D. Mollenhauer,et al.  Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations , 2006 .

[18]  Endel V. Iarve,et al.  Mesh independent modelling of cracks by using higher order shape functions , 2003 .

[19]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[20]  Z. Hashin,et al.  A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials , 1973 .

[21]  D. Mollenhauer,et al.  Damage Initiation and Propagation Modeling in Laminated Composites under Fatigue Loading , 2016 .

[22]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference , 2015 .

[23]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Modelling the interaction between matrix cracks and delamination damage in scaled quasi-isotropic specimens , 2008 .

[24]  D. Mollenhauer,et al.  Three-dimensional stress analysis and Weibull statistics based strength prediction in open hole composites , 2007 .

[25]  Tong Earn Tay,et al.  Characterization and analysis of delamination fracture in composites: An overview of developments from 1990 to 2001 , 2003 .

[26]  N. J. Pagano,et al.  2.13 – Delamination of Polymer Matrix Composites: Problems and Assessment , 2000 .

[27]  The NASA STI Program Office provides , 1998 .

[28]  Tk O'Brien,et al.  Towards a Damage Tolerance Philosophy for Composite Materials and Structures , 1990 .