Supply chain management as Lakatosian research program

Purpose – There is an ongoing and controversial debate about the current state of maturity of supply chain management (SCM) as research discipline and its future development. Openness to theory of other fields is on the one hand welcome and on the other hand denounced as arbitrariness hampering the progression of SCM. This paper aims to contribute to this debate outlining one promising framework that structures the field and provides guidance for its evolution. Design/methodology/approach – This paper conceives SCM as a Lakatosian research program from a philosophy of knowledge perspective that allows for continuously developing the knowledge base of SCM. After outlining the peculiarities of knowledge development according to Lakatos, the hard core of the program is delimitated from its protective belt by means of various analytical criteria referring to the meta, discipline, and practice level. The distinction framework is illustratively applied to four SCM research articles. Findings – Developing SCM as...

[1]  Neil Towers,et al.  Employing the participative paradigm as a valid empirical approach to gaining a greater understanding of contemporary supply chain and distribution management issues , 2008 .

[2]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  M. Avenier.  Shaping a Constructivist View of Organizational Design Science , 2010 .

[4]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Mortality, Reproducibility, and the Persistence of Styles of Theory , 1995 .

[5]  Ying-Ying Liao,et al.  The effect of individual, network, and collaborative competencies on the supply chain management system , 2012 .

[6]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  A call for theory: The maturation of the supply chain management discipline , 2011 .

[7]  Robert B. Handfield,et al.  Trust, power, dependence, and economics: can SCM research borrow paradigms? , 2004 .

[8]  Arni Halldorsson,et al.  Logistics knowledge creation: reflections on content, context and processes , 2002 .

[9]  Paul F. Skilton.  GETTING THE READER TO “I GET IT!”: CLARIFICATION, DIFFERENTIATION AND ILLUSTRATION , 2011 .

[10]  Alison Ashby,et al.  Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature , 2012 .

[11]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  Starry‐eyed: journal rankings and the future of logistics research , 2013 .

[12]  Zoe J. Radnor,et al.  Theoretical perspectives in purchasing and supply chain management: an analysis of the literature , 2010 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[14]  S. D. Amundson.  Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines , 1998 .

[15]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[16]  Ingeman Arbnor,et al.  Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge , 1997 .

[17]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Towards a “theoretical toolbox” for strategic sourcing , 2009 .

[18]  Frances Fabian,et al.  Keeping the Tension: Pressures to Keep the Controversy in the Management Discipline , 2000 .

[19]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[20]  Jesper Aastrup,et al.  Quality criteria for qualitative inquiries in logistics , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[23]  Elcio M. Tachizawa,et al.  Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[24]  C. Pilbeam,et al.  Nestlé Nespresso AAA sustainable quality program: an investigation into the governance dynamics in a multi‐stakeholder supply chain network , 2010 .

[25]  Frederik Zachariassen,et al.  Implementation of SCM in inter-organizational relationships: A symbolic perspective , 2010 .

[26]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[27]  S. New.  The scope of supply chain management research , 1997 .

[28]  L. Smircich,et al.  The Case for Qualitative Research , 1980 .

[29]  B. Gammelgaard.  Schools in logistics research?: A methodological framework for analysis of the discipline , 2004 .

[30]  Prakash J. Singh,et al.  Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research , 2006 .

[31]  R. Stratton,et al.  Variation and uncertainty buffering: a grocery supply case , 2012 .

[32]  R. Piekkari,et al.  Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research , 2011, Research Methods in International Business.

[33]  Matloub Hussain,et al.  Analysis of the bullwhip effect with order batching in multi‐echelon supply chains , 2011 .

[34]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[35]  Erwin van der Laan,et al.  Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: Procrastinating Integration in Mainstream Research , 2010 .

[36]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[37]  R. Lamming,et al.  Supply management: is it a discipline? , 2006 .

[38]  Glyn Watson.  Uncertainty and contractual hazard in the film industry: managing adversarial collaboration with dominant suppliers , 2004 .

[39]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project , 2010 .