Distinct ECM mechanosensing pathways regulate microtubule dynamics to control endothelial cell branching morphogenesis

The compliance and dimensionality of the ECM regulate distinct changes in microtubule growth speed and growth persistence.

[1]  S. Halpain,et al.  The Role of Microtubule-Associated Protein 2c in the Reorganization of Microtubules and Lamellipodia during Neurite Initiation , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Blum,et al.  Attenuation of actinomyosinII contractile activity in growth cones accelerates filopodia-guided and microtubule-based neurite elongation , 2007, Brain Research.

[3]  K. Beningo,et al.  Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  D. Ingber.  Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. , 2002, Circulation research.

[6]  K. Jaqaman,et al.  Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[7]  Holger Gerhardt,et al.  Neuropilin‐1 is required for endothelial tip cell guidance in the developing central nervous system , 2004, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[8]  E. Dent,et al.  Cytoskeletal Dynamics and Transport in Growth Cone Motility and Axon Guidance , 2003, Neuron.

[9]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell migration in 3D matrix. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[10]  J. Chilton.  Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[11]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Robert S. Adelstein,et al.  Local Cortical Tension by Myosin II Guides 3D Endothelial Cell Branching , 2009, Current Biology.

[13]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Analysis of Microtubule Dynamic Instability Using a Plus End Growth Marker , 2010, Nature Methods.

[16]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast mechanics in 3D collagen matrices. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[17]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Spatial regulation of CLASP affinity for microtubules by Rac1 and GSK3β in migrating epithelial cells , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  Dissecting Temporal and Spatial Control of Cytokinesis with a Myosin II Inhibitor , 2003, Science.

[20]  A. Straight,et al.  Blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor, is photoinactivated by blue light. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[21]  A. Akhmanova,et al.  Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability. , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[22]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  G. Borisy,et al.  Life cycle of MTs: persistent growth in the cell interior, asymmetric transition frequencies and effects of the cell boundary. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[24]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Tensile stress stimulates microtubule outgrowth in living cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[26]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell–matrix interactions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[28]  D. Schlaepfer,et al.  Localized Stabilization of Microtubules by Integrin- and FAK-Facilitated Rho Signaling , 2004, Science.

[29]  K. Alitalo,et al.  VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Conserved microtubule–actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  G. Gallo,et al.  Myosin‐II negatively regulates minor process extension and the temporal development of neuronal polarity , 2009, Developmental neurobiology.

[32]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[33]  Leif Dehmelt,et al.  Actin and microtubules in neurite initiation: are MAPs the missing link? , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[34]  D. Ingber,et al.  Tumor-derived endothelial cells exhibit aberrant Rho-mediated mechanosensing and abnormal angiogenesis in vitro , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[36]  K. Kalil,et al.  Touch and go: guidance cues signal to the growth cone cytoskeleton , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Holger Gerhardt,et al.  How do endothelial cells orientate? , 2005, EXS.

[39]  K. Kalil,et al.  Axon Branching Requires Interactions between Dynamic Microtubules and Actin Filaments , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Olson.  Contraction reaction: mechanical regulation of Rho GTPase. , 2004, Trends in cell biology.