optoPAD, a closed-loop optogenetics system to study the circuit basis of feeding behaviors

The regulation of feeding plays a key role in determining the fitness of animals through its impact on nutrition. Elucidating the circuit basis of feeding and related behaviors is an important goal in neuroscience. We recently used a system for closed-loop optogenetic manipulation of neurons contingent on the feeding behavior of Drosophila to dissect the impact of a specific subset of taste neurons on yeast feeding. Here, we describe the development and validation of this system, which we term the optoPAD. We use the optoPAD to induce appetitive and aversive effects on feeding by activating or inhibiting gustatory neurons in closed-loop – effectively creating virtual taste realities. The use of optogenetics allowed us to vary the dynamics and probability of stimulation in single flies and assess the impact on feeding behavior quantitatively and with high throughput. These data demonstrate that the optoPAD is a powerful tool to dissect the circuit basis of feeding behavior, allowing the efficient implementation of sophisticated behavioral paradigms to study the mechanistic basis of animals’ adaptation to dynamic environments.

[1]  Pierre-Yves Musso,et al.  A complex peripheral code for salt taste in Drosophila , 2018, eLife.

[2]  Erin L. Rich,et al.  Orbitofrontal cortex , 2018, Current Biology.

[3]  Benjamin L. de Bivort,et al.  Ethology as a physical science , 2018, Nature Physics.

[4]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Activation of serotonin neurons promotes active persistence in a probabilistic foraging task , 2018, Nature Communications.

[6]  Kristin Scott,et al.  Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2018, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The functional organization of descending sensory-motor pathways in Drosophila , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Huber,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of sleep and feeding in individual Drosophila , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[9]  L. Chittka.  Bee cognition , 2017, Current Biology.

[10]  Adam J. Calhoun,et al.  Quantifying behavior to solve sensorimotor transformations: advances from worms and flies , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  Pavel M Itskov,et al.  Internal amino acid state modulates yeast taste neurons to support protein homeostasis in Drosophila , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  Carlos Ribeiro,et al.  Gonadal ecdysone titers are modulated by protein availability but do not impact protein appetite. , 2017, Journal of insect physiology.

[13]  Pavel M Itskov,et al.  Commensal bacteria and essential amino acids control food choice behavior and reproduction , 2017, PLoS biology.

[14]  Jia Yi Chua,et al.  Optogenetic inhibition of behavior with anion channelrhodopsins , 2017, Nature Methods.

[15]  Aldo A. Faisal,et al.  Internal states drive nutrient homeostasis by modulating exploration-exploitation trade-off , 2016, bioRxiv.

[16]  K. Branson,et al.  Computational Analysis of Behavior. , 2016, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Christian Schusterreiter,et al.  A Taste Circuit that Regulates Ingestion by Integrating Food and Hunger Signals , 2016, Cell.

[18]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Mapping Sub-Second Structure in Mouse Behavior , 2015, Neuron.

[19]  Samuel James Walker,et al.  Postmating Circuitry Modulates Salt Taste Processing to Increase Reproductive Output in Drosophila , 2015, Current Biology.

[20]  A. Koulakov,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Required for Optimal Waiting Based on Decision Confidence , 2014, Neuron.

[21]  P. Perona,et al.  Toward a Science of Computational Ethology , 2014, Neuron.

[22]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila , 2014, Nature Communications.

[23]  Gonçalo Lopes,et al.  Bonsai: an event-based framework for processing and controlling data streams , 2014, bioRxiv.

[24]  S. Pletcher,et al.  FLIC: High-Throughput, Continuous Analysis of Feeding Behaviors in Drosophila , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Independent Optical Excitation of Distinct Neural Populations , 2014, Nature Methods.

[26]  B. Dickson,et al.  Sex Peptide Receptor and Neuronal TOR/S6K Signaling Modulate Nutrient Balancing in Drosophila , 2010, Current Biology.

[27]  N. Ryba,et al.  Common Sense about Taste: From Mammals to Insects , 2009, Cell.

[28]  Pietro Perona,et al.  High-throughput Ethomics in Large Groups of Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[29]  C. Montell,et al.  Gr64f Is Required in Combination with Other Gustatory Receptors for Sugar Detection in Drosophila , 2008, Current Biology.

[30]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A toolbox for light control of Drosophila behaviors through Channelrhodopsin 2‐mediated photoactivation of targeted neurons , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Kristin Scott,et al.  Imaging Taste Responses in the Fly Brain Reveals a Functional Map of Taste Category and Behavior , 2006, Neuron.

[32]  H. Amrein,et al.  Taste Perception and Coding in Drosophila , 2004, Current Biology.

[33]  W. Schultz,et al.  Discrete Coding of Reward Probability and Uncertainty by Dopamine Neurons , 2003, Science.

[34]  E. Dorinda Loeffel,et al.  The Hungry Fly: A Physiological Study of the Behavior Associated With Feeding , 1977 .

[35]  J. D. Davis.  The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[36]  D. L. McLEAN,et al.  A Technique for Electronically Recording Aphid Feeding and Salivation , 1964, Nature.

[37]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Neural Circuits: A Decade of Progress , 2018, Neuron.

[38]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[39]  T.W.T. Dillon,et al.  What Is a Complex , 1943 .