Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?

ObjectiveOsteoporosis diagnosis using multidetector CT (MDCT) is limited to relatively high radiation exposure. We investigated the effect of simulated ultra-low-dose protocols on in-vivo bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative trabecular bone assessment.Materials and methodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained. Twelve subjects with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 12 age- and gender-matched controls undergoing routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT were included (average effective dose: 10 mSv). Ultra-low radiation examinations were achieved by simulating lower tube currents and sparse samplings at 50%, 25% and 10% of the original dose. BMD and trabecular bone parameters were extracted in T10–L5.ResultsExcept for BMD measurements in sparse sampling data, absolute values of all parameters derived from ultra-low-dose data were significantly different from those derived from original dose images (p<0.05). BMD, apparent bone fraction and trabecular thickness were still consistently lower in subjects with than in those without fractures (p<0.05).ConclusionIn ultra-low-dose scans, BMD and microstructure parameters were able to differentiate subjects with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting osteoporosis diagnosis is feasible. However, absolute values differed from original values. BMD from sparse sampling appeared to be more robust. This dose-dependency of parameters should be considered for future clinical use.Key Points• BMD and quantitative bone parameters are assessable in ultra-low-dose in vivo MDCT scans.• Bone mineral density does not change significantly when sparse sampling is applied.• Quantitative trabecular bone microstructure measurements are sensitive to dose reduction.• Osteoporosis subjects could be differentiated even at 10% of original dose.• Radiation exposure should be considered when comparing quantitative bone parameters.

[1]  Ernst J Rummeny,et al.  Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2000, NIH consensus statement.

[3]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Measuring smoking-related preoccupation and compulsive drive: evaluation of the obsessive compulsive smoking scale , 2010, Psychopharmacology.

[4]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Effect of Low-Dose MDCT and Iterative Reconstruction on Trabecular Bone Microstructure Assessment , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  C. Räth,et al.  Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur—prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Qiu Wang,et al.  A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. , 2013, Medical physics.

[8]  Andreas Fehringer,et al.  A versatile tomographic forward- and back-projection approach on multi-GPUs , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[10]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[12]  Hajime Orimo,et al.  Multi‐Detector Row CT Imaging of Vertebral Microstructure for Evaluation of Fracture Risk , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Combining Ordered Subsets and Momentum for Accelerated X-Ray CT Image Reconstruction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Anders Eklund,et al.  Medical image processing on the GPU - Past, present and future , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  Christian Graeff,et al.  Monitoring Teriparatide‐Associated Changes in Vertebral Microstructure by High‐Resolution CT In Vivo: Results From the EUROFORS Study , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Does Iterative Reconstruction Lower CT Radiation Dose: Evaluation of 15,000 Examinations , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[18]  G. Stamm,et al.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  E. Sidky,et al.  Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT , 2009, 0904.4495.

[20]  A. Hofman,et al.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. , 2004, Bone.

[21]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[22]  Thomas Koehler,et al.  Ultra Low Dose CT Pulmonary Angiography with Iterative Reconstruction , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  T Baum,et al.  High-resolution bone imaging for osteoporosis diagnostics and therapy monitoring using clinical MDCT and MRI. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[24]  Lehana Thabane,et al.  Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[25]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  M. Vannier,et al.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? , 2009, Inverse problems.

[27]  Thomas M Link,et al.  osteoporosis imaging : State of the Art and Advanced Imaging 1 , 2022 .

[28]  E. Rummeny,et al.  BMD measurements of the spine derived from sagittal reformations of contrast-enhanced MDCT without dedicated software. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[29]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength? , 2013, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[30]  J. Fessler Statistical Image Reconstruction Methods for Transmission Tomography , 2000 .

[31]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.