Enabling Authors to Produce Computable Phenotype Measurements: Usability Studies on the Measurement Recorder

[1]  Hong Cui,et al.  Building the “Plant Glossary”—A controlled botanical vocabulary using terms extracted from the Floras of North America and China , 2017 .

[2]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Conceptual Models: Core to Good Design , 2011, Conceptual Models.

[3]  Chris Mungall,et al.  Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Antje Chang,et al.  Development of a classification scheme for disease-related enzyme information , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  Hilmar Lapp,et al.  Annotation of phenotypes using ontologies: a gold standard for the training and evaluation of natural language processing systems , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  Hilmar Lapp,et al.  Moving the mountain: analysis of the effort required to transform comparative anatomy into computable anatomy , 2015, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[7]  Mark Ware,et al.  The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing fourth edition , 2015 .

[8]  K. Bretonnel Cohen,et al.  Text mining and manual curation of chemical-gene-disease networks for the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Hong Cui,et al.  Incentivising use of structured language in biological descriptions: Author-driven phenotype data and ontology production , 2018, Biodiversity data journal.

[10]  Emily Dimmer,et al.  An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  James P. Balhoff,et al.  CharaParser+EQ: Performance evaluation without gold standard , 2015, ASIST.