Comparing the cyclic behavior of concrete cylinders confined by shape memory alloy wire or steel jackets

Shape memory alloy (SMA) wire jackets for concrete are distinct from conventional jackets of steel or fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) since they provide active confinement which can be easily achieved due to the shape memory effect of SMAs. This study uses NiTiNb SMA wires of 1.0 mm diameter to confine concrete cylinders with the dimensions of 300 mm × 150 mm (L × D). The NiTiNb SMAs have a relatively wider temperature hysteresis than NiTi SMAs; thus, they are more suitable for the severe temperature-variation environments to which civil structures are exposed. Steel jackets of passive confinement are also prepared in order to compare the cyclic behavior of actively and passively confined concrete cylinders. For this purpose, monotonic and cyclic compressive loading tests are conducted to obtain axial and circumferential strain. Both strains are used to estimate the volumetric strains of concrete cylinders. Plastic strains from cyclic behavior are also estimated. For the cylinders jacketed by NiTiNb SMA wires, the monotonic axial behavior differs from the envelope of cyclic behavior. The plastic strains of the actively confined concrete show a similar trend to those of passive confinement. This study proposed plastic strain models for concrete confined by SMA wire or steel jackets. For the volumetric strain, the active jackets of NiTiNb SMA wires provide more energy dissipation than the passive jacket of steel. (Some figures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version)

[1]  Shuichi Miyazaki,et al.  Effect of cyclic deformation on the pseudoelasticity characteristics of Ti-Ni alloys , 1986 .

[2]  C. Hsu,et al.  STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE UNDER CYCLIC LOADING , 1998 .

[3]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges , 2000 .

[4]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  EFFECT OF POUNDING AND RESTRAINERS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTIPLE-FRAME BRIDGES , 2002 .

[5]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys , 2002 .

[6]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[7]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[8]  Bradley W. Penar,et al.  Recentering Beam-Column Connections Using Shape Memory Alloys , 2005 .

[9]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Effect of mechanical training on the properties of superelastic shape memory alloys for seismic applications , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  Unloading and Reloading Stress–Strain Model for Confined Concrete , 2006 .

[11]  M. Saiidi,et al.  Exploratory Study of Seismic Response of Concrete Columns with Shape Memory Alloys Reinforcement , 2006 .

[12]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Comparison between Shape Memory Alloy Seismic Restrainers and Other Bridge Retrofit Devices , 2007 .

[13]  Joonam Park,et al.  A new steel jacketing method for RC columns , 2008 .

[14]  E. Choi,et al.  The behavior of concrete cylinders confined by shape memory alloy wires , 2008 .

[15]  Moncef L. Nehdi,et al.  Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Behavior of Beam-Column Joints Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys , 2008 .

[16]  J. Teng,et al.  Stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete under cyclic axial compression , 2009 .

[17]  M. Saiid Saiidi,et al.  Cyclic Response of Concrete Bridge Columns Using Superelastic Nitinol and Bendable Concrete , 2009 .

[18]  Do Hyung Lee,et al.  Shape memory alloy bending bars as seismic restrainers for bridges in seismic areas , 2009 .

[19]  Soon-Jong Yoon,et al.  Comparison of seismic performance of three restrainers for multiple-span bridges using fragility analysis , 2010 .

[20]  E. Choi,et al.  Recovery and residual stress of SMA wires and applications for concrete structures , 2010 .

[21]  Maenghyo Cho,et al.  A simple smart wing actuator using Ni-Ti SMA , 2010 .

[22]  Young-Soo Chung,et al.  The confining effectiveness of NiTiNb and NiTi SMA wire jackets for concrete , 2010 .

[23]  B. Andrawes,et al.  Active Confinement of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Using Shape Memory Alloys , 2010 .

[24]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Connections. Part I — Analysis and Seismic Demands , 2010 .

[25]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Design, analysis and application of innovative composite PR connections between steel beams and CFT columns , 2011 .