Assessment of Future Aero Engine Designs With Intercooled and Intercooled Recuperated Cores

Reduction of CO2 emissions is strongly linked with the improvement of engine specific fuel consumption, as well as the reduction of engine nacelle drag and weight. Conventional turbofan designs however that reduce CO2 emissions - such as increased OPR designs - can increase the production of NOx emissions. In the present work, funded by the European Framework 6 collaborative project NEWAC, an aero engine multidisciplinary design tool, TERA2020, has been utilised to study the potential benefits from introducing heat-exchanged cores in future turbofan engine designs. The tool comprises of various modules covering a wide range of disciplines: engine performance, engine aerodynamic and mechanical design, aircraft design and performance, emissions prediction and environmental impact, engine and airframe noise, as well as production, maintenance and direct operating costs. Fundamental performance differences between heat-exchanged cores and a conventional core are discussed and quantified. Cycle limitations imposed by mechanical considerations, operational limitations and emissions legislation are also discussed. The research work presented in this paper concludes with a full assessment at aircraft system level that reveals the significant potential performance benefits for the intercooled and intercooled recuperated cycles. An intercooled core can be designed for a significantly higher OPR and with reduced cooling air requirements, providing a higher thermal efficiency than could otherwise be practically achieved with a conventional core. Variable geometry can be implemented to optimise the use of the intercooler for a given flight mission. An intercooled recuperated core can provide high thermal efficiency at low OPR values and also benefit significantly from the introduction of a variable geometry low pressure turbine. The necessity of introducing novel lean-burn combustion technology, to reduce NOx emissions, at cruise as well as for the landing and take-off cycle, is demonstrated for both heat-exchanged cores and conventional designs. Significant benefits in terms of NOx reduction are predicted from the introduction of a variable geometry low pressure turbine in an intercooled core with lean-burn combustion technology.

[1]  Paul Storm,et al.  Thermomechanical Design of a Heat Exchanger for a Recuperative Aeroengine , 2006 .

[2]  Andrew Rolt,et al.  Duct Aerodynamics for Intercooled Aero Gas Turbines: Constraints, Concepts and Design Methodology , 2009 .

[3]  Anders Lundbladh,et al.  Heat Exchanger Weight and Efficiency Impact on Jet Engine Transport Applications , 2003 .

[4]  A. Lefebvre Gas Turbine Combustion , 1983 .

[5]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Introduction of Intercooling in a High Bypass Jet Engine , 2000 .

[6]  Stefano Boggia,et al.  Intercooled Recuperated Gas Turbine Engine Concept , 2005 .

[7]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Recuperated gas turbine aeroengines, part II: engine design studies following early development testing , 2008 .

[8]  G. Pellischek,et al.  Compact heat exchanger technology for aero engines , 1991 .

[9]  Tomas Grönstedt,et al.  Mission Optimization of an Intercooled Turbofan Engine , 2007 .

[10]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Recuperated gas turbine aeroengines. Part III: engine concepts for reduced emissions, lower fuel consumption, and noise abatement , 2008 .

[11]  M. A. da Cunha Alves,et al.  An insight on intercooling and reheat gas turbine cycles , 2001 .

[12]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Recuperated gas turbine aeroengines, part I: early development activities , 2008 .

[13]  J. H. Horlock,et al.  Limitations on Gas Turbine Performance Imposed by Large Turbine Cooling Flows , 2000 .

[14]  Nick J. Baker,et al.  New Environmental Friendly Aero Engine Core Concepts , 2007 .

[15]  Erik Dick,et al.  RAISING CYCLE EFFICIENCY BY INTERCOOLING IN AIR-COOLED GAS TURBINES , 2006 .

[16]  Stephen Ogaji,et al.  Low Pressure System Component Advancements and its Impact on Future Turbofan Engine Emissions , 2009 .

[17]  J. B. Young,et al.  The effect of turbine blade cooling on the cycle efficiency of gas turbine power cycles , 2005 .

[18]  Stephen Ogaji,et al.  EVA : A Tool for EnVironmental Assessment of Novel Propulsion Cycles , 2008 .

[19]  Tomas Grönstedt,et al.  Design and Analysis of an Intercooled Turbofan Engine , 2010 .

[20]  Jean-Jacques Korsia VITAL - European R&D Programme for Greener Aero-Engines , 2007 .

[21]  Nick J. Baker,et al.  Intercooled turbofan engine design and technology research in the EU Framework 6 NEWAC programme , 2009 .