A Structural Optimisation Method for a Soft Pneumatic Actuator

This study aims to investigate the effects of various design parameters on the actuation performance of a pneumatic network actuator (PNA), optimise its structure using the finite element method (FEM), and subsequently quantify the performance of the resulting actuator topology experimentally. The effects of the structural parameters, including the operation pressure, the wall thickness and the gap between the chambers, bottom layer thickness, and the geometry of the channel cross section, on the deformation and bending angle of the actuator were evaluated to optimise the performance of the pneumatic actuator. A Global Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to investigate how the variables affect the mechanical output of the actuator and, thus, the significance of variables affecting the deformation (and bending angle) of the pneumatic actuator was identified. After the parameter optimisation, a pneumatic channel with a 4.5 mm bottom layer thickness, 1.5 mm wall thickness, and 1.5 mm gap between sequential chambers is recommended to perform optimised bending motion for the pneumatic network actuator. The optimised FE model results were verified experimentally. This design optimisation method based on the FEM and ANOVA analysis can be extended to the topology optimisation of other soft actuators.

[1]  Rob N. Candler,et al.  Pneumatic microfinger with balloon fins for linear motion using 3D printed molds , 2015 .

[2]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[3]  L Mahadevan,et al.  Grasping with a soft glove: intrinsic impedance control in pneumatic actuators , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Flexible microactuator for miniature robots , 1991, [1991] Proceedings. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[5]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Camouflage and Display for Soft Machines , 2012, Science.

[6]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Soft Autonomous Materials - Using Active Elasticity and Embedded Distributed Computation , 2010, ISER.

[7]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[9]  Mehmet Remzi Dogar,et al.  Haptic identification of objects using a modular soft robotic gripper , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[10]  Hong Kai Yap,et al.  A soft exoskeleton for hand assistive and rehabilitation application using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Jennifer C. Case,et al.  Soft Material Characterization for Robotic Applications , 2015 .

[12]  C. Keplinger,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: A Soft Future: From Robots and Sensor Skin to Energy Harvesters , 2013, Advanced materials.

[13]  Xin Chen,et al.  Soft Mobile Robots with On-Board Chemical Pressure Generation , 2011, ISRR.

[14]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  G. Alici,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Bending Behavior of Soft Pneumatic Actuators Made of Discrete Actuation Chambers. , 2017, Soft robotics.

[16]  Shuichi Wakimoto,et al.  Miniature Pneumatic Curling Rubber Actuator Generating Bidirectional Motion with One Air-Supply Tube , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[17]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Softer is Harder: What Differentiates Soft Robotics from Hard Robotics? , 2018 .

[18]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs , 2016, Soft robotics.

[19]  Andrew Wong,et al.  Soft Pneumatic Bending Actuator with Integrated Carbon Nanotube Displacement Sensor , 2016, Robotics.

[20]  Rebecca K. Kramer,et al.  Soft Material Characterization for Robotic Applications , 2015 .

[21]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[23]  C. D. Onal,et al.  A modular approach to soft robots , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[24]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Whole arm planning for a soft and highly compliant 2D robotic manipulator , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.