INFLUENCE OF CHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL COMPOSITION OF METAKAOLIN ON MORTAR CHARACTERISTICS

Three different metakaolins processed by a Portuguese factory were studied aiming to assess the influence of chemical and mineralogical composition of metakaolin on mortar characteristics. Mineralogical analysis of both the fine and clay fractions was carried out by X-ray diffraction. Chemical composition (major elements) was analyzed by X-ray fluorescence. Mineralogical composition reveals some significant differences between the studied samples, in both analyzed fractions, metakaolin 2 being richer in kaolinitic minerals. From a chemical point of view, siliceous content is always high (around 60 %) as well as Al2O3 content (around 30 %); once again metakaolin 2 is the one richer in Al2O3 and poorer in sodium and potassium. Metakaolin from the three different batches was incorporated in lime mortars in order to produce a pozzolanic reaction and hence enable them to harden in high relative humidity conditions or, when access to CO2 is limited, as in the case of mortars supporting glazed tiles. Mortars with the same volumetric ratio were tested for flexural and compressive strength at ages of 28 and 90 days, and the module of elasticity was determined. A relation between the mechanical strength achieved by lime mortars with the addition of metakaolin from different batches and metakaolin mineral and chemical composition was assessed. The knowledge of the influence of the metakaolin composition on the strength of the mortars is an important step in improving their performance and extending their application.

[1]  F. Rocha,et al.  Clay minerals from the sedimentary cover from the Northwest Iberian shelf , 2002 .

[2]  Michael D. A. Thomas,et al.  The effect of metakaolin on alkali-silica reaction in concrete , 2000 .

[3]  J. Bai,et al.  Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review , 2001 .

[4]  Jeanne Marie Teutonico,et al.  The Smeaton project: factors affecting the properties of lime-based mortars , 1993 .

[5]  Ana Velosa,et al.  Evaluation of mechanical compatibility of renders to apply on old walls based on a restrained shrinkage test , 2007 .

[6]  F. Rocha,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of the influence of textural, mineralogical and geochemical parameters on the geotechnical behaviour of the 'Argilas de Aveiro' Formation (Portugal) , 1999 .

[7]  Michael Wingate,et al.  Building with Lime , 2002 .

[8]  A. Moropoulou,et al.  Evaluation of pozzolanic activity of natural and artificial pozzolans by thermal analysis , 2004 .

[9]  G. Kakali,et al.  Metakaolin as a main cement constituent. Exploitation of poor Greek kaolins , 2005 .

[10]  A. Ribeiro,et al.  The use of fly ash and metakaolin for the prevention of alkali-silica reaction and delayed ettringite formation in concrete , 2006 .

[11]  Ana Cristian Magalhães,et al.  Experimental applications of mortars with pozzolanic additions: Characterization and performance evaluation , 2009 .

[12]  Han-Young Moon,et al.  Strength properties and durability aspects of high strength concrete using Korean metakaolin , 2007 .

[13]  Michael Wingate,et al.  Building with Lime: A Practical Introduction , 1997 .

[14]  R. Siddique,et al.  Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete: A review , 2009 .

[15]  Sagrario Martínez-Ramírez,et al.  Modelling of slaked lime–metakaolin mortar engineering characteristics in terms of process variables , 2006 .

[16]  Robert C. Reynolds,et al.  X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals , 1989 .

[17]  A. Moropoulou,et al.  REVERSE ENGINEERING: A PROPER METHODOLOGY FOR COMPATIBLE RESTORATION MORTARS , 2009 .