Estimating Power Sector Leakage Risks and Provincial Impacts of Canadian Carbon Pricing

Carbon pricing systems have emerged in Canada at provincial and federal levels to reduce CO 2 emissions. However, cross-border electricity trade with the U.S. is already extensive, and although Canada is currently a net exporter, policy changes could alter these trade dynamics. Since CO 2 emissions are currently unregulated in many U.S. states, there is a concern that this incomplete regulatory coverage will lead to emissions leakage, as electric generation and emissions shift toward these unregulated regions. This paper examines potential power sector emissions leakage and distributional implications across provinces from Canadian carbon pricing. Using an integrated model of electric sector investments and operations with detailed spatial and temporal resolutions, the analysis demonstrates how emissions leakage through trade adjustments can be non-trivial fractions of the intended emissions reductions even in the presence of leakage containment measures. Magnitudes of long-run leakage rates from Canadian carbon pricing depend on market and policy assumptions (e.g., natural gas prices, projected load growth, long-run demand elasticities, timing of future U.S. CO 2 policy), ranging from 13% (high gas price scenario with border carbon adjustments) to 76% (lower gas price scenario without antileakage measures), which are higher than reported literature values for national policies. When leakage containment measures are implemented, net emissions and leakage rates decrease, but gross emissions in Canada and policy costs increase. Leakage persists in alternate scenarios with constrained transmission expansion, higher natural gas prices, lower load growth, higher price elasticities of demand, and U.S. adoption of carbon pricing, but leakage rates decrease under these conditions.

[1]  J. D. Cendra Can Emission Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law , 2006 .

[2]  S. Borenstein The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Hoel,et al.  GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS: THE EFFECTS OF UNILATERAL ACTIONS TAKEN BY ONE COUNTRY , 1989 .

[4]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On choosing the resolution of normative models , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  James Merrick,et al.  Simulating Annual Variation in Load, Wind, and Solar by Representative Hour Selection , 2018, The Energy Journal.

[6]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  WHAT CAN HISTORY TEACH US? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States* , 2002 .

[7]  Enzo Sauma The impact of transmission constraints on the emissions leakage under cap-and-trade program , 2012 .

[8]  T. Eichner,et al.  Unilateral consumption-based carbon taxes and negative leakage☆ , 2015 .

[9]  Social cost of carbon pricing of power sector CO 2 : accounting for leakage and other social implications from subnational policies , 2018 .

[10]  Marjan W. Hofkes,et al.  Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage , 2010 .

[11]  Niven Winchester,et al.  Leakage from sub-national climate policy: The case of Californias capandtrade program , 2015 .

[12]  J. Bistline,et al.  The costs and value of renewable portfolio standards in meeting decarbonization goals , 2018, Energy Economics.

[13]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29) , 2012 .

[14]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Comparing Policies to Combat Emissions Leakage: Border Carbon Adjustments versus Rebates , 2011 .

[15]  John E. Bistline,et al.  Turn Down for What? The Economic Value of Operational Flexibility in Electricity Markets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[17]  C. Fischer,et al.  Developing Guidance for Implementing Border Carbon Adjustments: Lessons, Cautions, and Research Needs from the Literature , 2019, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[18]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Efficiency and Equity Implications of Alternative Instruments to Reduce Carbon Leakage , 2012 .

[19]  M. Babiker Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage , 2005 .

[20]  John Morrow,et al.  Unintended consequences of cap-and-trade? Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative , 2019, Energy Economics.

[21]  Stephen D. Comello,et al.  Managerial flexibility in levelized cost measures: A framework for incorporating uncertainty in energy investment decisions , 2018 .

[22]  P. Deane,et al.  Climate policy, interconnection and carbon leakage: The effect of unilateral UK policy on electricity and GHG emissions in Ireland , 2014 .

[23]  T. Rutherford,et al.  The Paris Agreement and next steps in limiting global warming , 2017, Climatic Change.

[24]  J. Logan,et al.  Interrogating uncertainty in energy forecasts: the case of the shale gas boom , 2019, Energy Transitions.

[25]  Yihsu Chen,et al.  Does a regional greenhouse gas policy make sense? A case study of carbon leakage and emissions spillover , 2009 .

[26]  J. Bistline,et al.  Economic drivers of wind and solar penetration in the US , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[27]  Peter Maniloff,et al.  Beneficial Leakage: The Effect of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative on Aggregate Emissions , 2015 .

[28]  M. Fowlie Incomplete Environmental Regulation, Imperfect Competition, and Emissions Leakage , 2009 .

[29]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Promotion in Germany , 2017 .

[30]  Sebastian Rausch,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of the Potential for Negative Emissions Leakage , 2013 .

[31]  John Bistline,et al.  The economic geography of variable renewable energy and impacts of trade formulations for renewable mandates , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[32]  J. Balmes California’s Cap-and-Trade Program , 2014 .

[33]  The Role of Border Carbon Adjustment in Unilateral Climate Policy Insights From An EMF Model Comparison DRAFT 9 / 23 / 12 , 2012 .

[34]  Susanne Droege,et al.  Using border measures to address carbon flows , 2011 .

[35]  Trieu Mai,et al.  The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the U.S. electricity system , 2018, Energy Economics.

[36]  K. Palmer,et al.  INCENTIVES, MARGINS, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS IN COMPREHENSIVE CLIMATE POLICY FOR THE POWER SECTOR , 2015 .