Vasectomy--a note of concern: reprise.

The title of my comments derives from Harold Lear's editorial, published inThe Journalalmost a decade ago. 1 Since Lear wrote, additional signs of concern have appeared, including the article in this issue by Walker and his colleagues (p 2315). In a carefully controlled study, Walker et al report causes for hospitalization of vasectomized men, compared with hospitalization for the same ailments in men who had not undergone vasectomy. Disorders of the genitourinary system constituted the only category in which hospitalization incidences were significantly greater in the vasectomized men than in the control population. However, the disorders included epididymitis and orchitis (well known though infrequent postvasectomy complications) and benign prostatic hypertrophy, redundant prepuce, phimosis, and other diseases of the male genitals. The authors wisely observe that the latter four conditions probably had been discovered when clients applied for vasectomy and that these conditions were not attributable to the operation

[1]  N. Alexander,et al.  Effect of vasectomy on the retinal vasculature of men. , 1980 .

[2]  S. MacIsaac,et al.  Vasectomy: Benefits and Risks , 1979, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[3]  L. Dubin,et al.  Frozen semen -- a poor form of fertility insurance. , 1979, Urology.

[4]  Squires Jw,et al.  The morbidity of vasectomy. , 1976 .

[5]  H. Lear Vasectomy--a note of concern. , 1972, JAMA.

[6]  D. Rodgers,et al.  Psychosocial response to vasectomy. , 1969, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  C. Tietze,et al.  Men with Vasectomies: A Study of Medical, Sexual, and Psychosocial Changes , 1967, Psychosomatic medicine.

[8]  K. Saha,et al.  Low fertility rate in vasovasostomized males and its possible immunologic mechanism. , 1975, International journal of fertility.