Challenges in Cross‐National Data Collection

Beth-Ellen Pennell Janet Harkness Rachel Levenstein Martine Quaglia X.1 Introduction This chapter discusses issues and considerations in data collection in cross-national and cross-cultural surveys. Although the extensive literature on the goals of comparative research frequently discusses challenges to equivalence and problems which may arise in such research (Mohler and Johnson, this volume), there appears to be little detailed investigation of the role that data collection plays in this process, particularly with regard to how to approach the design and implementation of data collection efforts in order to achieve greater equivalence. This chapter explores the various aspects of data collection and alerts the reader to issues especially relevant to cross-national or cross-cultural survey research. The material that follows is organized into seven sections, including this introduction. Section X.2 sets the stage for later discussion by addressing the complexity of cross-national survey research and the central role quality monitoring and documentation play in data collection. Section X.3 discusses organizational structures in large-scale projects, the importance of achieving standardization at the appropriate level of implementation, and the impact and relevance of country-specific variations in research infrastructure and traditions. Section X.4 focuses on data collection modes, considering the options and constraints in cross-national data collection efforts. Section X.5 deals with the numerous considerations directly related to fielding a survey: 5.1 addresses field staffing, the languages to be accommodated, and interviewer recruitment, training and remuneration; in 5.2, study protocols and procedures relevant for the data collection phase are considered; topics covered include ethics reviews, community engagement models, household contact protocols, privacy issues, nonresponse bias reduction; and collecting biomarker and other physical measures. Section 5.3 deals with field structures, and interviewer supervision and management during fielding. In section 6, testing, quality monitoring and control are discussed, illustrating the importance of monitoring and evaluating survey outcomes . Issues particular to natural disaster and longitudinal studies are also noted . The final section, Section 7 highlights areas of future research and visits the role that documentation of procedures and survey outcomes can play in developing best practices for cross-national or cross-cultural survey data collection. x.2 Background Potential challenges to comparability are myriad in cross-national data collection. Examples include collecting data in multiple languages and dialects (some possibly without a standard

[1]  C. Mathers,et al.  Violence-related mortality in Iraq from 2002 to 2006. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Barbara Schaan Fieldwork and Survey Management in SHARE , 2008 .

[3]  R. Groves,et al.  Telephone Survey Methodology. , 1990 .

[4]  P. Lewis Ethnologue : languages of the world , 2009 .

[5]  R. Groves Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[6]  S. Doocy,et al.  Mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey , 2006, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Armer,et al.  Comparative social research: methodological problems and strategies , 1976 .

[8]  N. N. Available World medical association declaration of Helsinki , 2000, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.

[9]  Margaret Ellen Grosh,et al.  A manual for planning and implementing the Living standards measurement study survey , 1996 .

[10]  L. Rips,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2000 .

[11]  Jean M. Converse,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF BLACK AND WHITE INTERVIEWERS ON BLACK RESPONSES IN 1968 , 1971 .

[12]  E. Kane,et al.  INTERVIEWER GENDER AND GENDER ATTITUDES , 1993 .

[13]  Dianne J Terlouw,et al.  Use of handheld computers with global positioning systems for probability sampling and data entry in household surveys. , 2007, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[14]  R. Jowell,et al.  The European Social Survey as a measurement model , 2011 .

[15]  Erwin K. Scheuch,et al.  THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS OF COMPARATIVE SURVEY RESEARCH: WHY THE WHEEL OF CROSS-CULTURAL METHODOLOGY KEEPS ON BEING REINVENTED , 1989 .

[16]  E. D. de Leeuw,et al.  Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison , 2002 .

[17]  M. Couper,et al.  Nonresponse in cross-cultural and cross-national surveys , 2003 .

[18]  Olivier Pilmis Does Public Opinion finally exist? The use of ESS to test Pierre Bourdieu's Theory , 2006 .

[19]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  The influence of interviewers' attitude and behaviour on household survey nonresponse: an international comparison , 2002 .

[20]  Jianhong Lu,et al.  Criminological Research in Contemporary China , 2007, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[21]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Paul P. Biemer,et al.  Introduction to Survey Quality , 2003 .

[23]  Else Øyen Comparative methodology : theory and practice in international social research , 1991 .

[24]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Nonresponse in Web Surveys , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[25]  L. Jansen Local IRBs, multicenter trials, and the ethics of internal amendments. , 2005, IRB.

[26]  Manfred Kuechler,et al.  The Survey Method , 1998 .

[27]  Sabina Kef,et al.  Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing Tailored for Special Populations and Topics , 2003 .

[28]  M. Traugott,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research , 2007 .

[29]  E. Singer NONRESPONSE BIAS IN HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS , 2006 .

[30]  R. Groves,et al.  A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation , 2001 .

[31]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Nonresponse In Household Interview Surveys , 1998 .

[32]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  THE GLOBALIZATION OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH , 2005 .

[33]  H. Garretsen,et al.  The effect of data collection mode and ethnicity of interviewer on response rates and self-reported alcohol use among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: an experimental study. , 2005, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[34]  Z. Bankowski,et al.  Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences , 1991 .

[35]  R. Groves,et al.  Survey Errors and Survey Costs. , 1991 .

[36]  Peter Lynn,et al.  What's so special about cross-national surveys? , 2006 .

[37]  R. Manchin,et al.  The burden of crime in the EU : A comparative analysis of the European Survey of Crime and Safety (EU ICS 2005) , 2007 .

[38]  Darren W. Davis,et al.  Nonrandom Measurement Error and Race of Interviewer Effects Among African Americans , 1997 .

[39]  S. Plattner,et al.  National Bioethics Advisory Commission , 2001 .

[40]  Timothy P. Johnson,et al.  Social desirability in cross-cultural research , 2003 .

[41]  A. Koch Wenn "mehr" nicht gleichbedeutend mit "besser" ist: Ausschöpfungsquoten und Stichprobenverzerrungen in allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfragen , 1998 .

[42]  Peter Lynn,et al.  The problem of nonresponse , 2008 .

[43]  Leslie Kish,et al.  Studies of Interviewer Variance for Attitudinal Variables , 1962 .

[44]  M. Kohn,et al.  Cross-national research in sociology , 1989 .

[45]  I. Stoop,et al.  Estimation of nonresponse bias in the European Social Survey: using information from reluctant respondents , 2007 .

[46]  J. Bethlehem Weighting nonresponse adjustments based on auxiliary information , 2002 .

[47]  S. Doocy,et al.  Tsunami mortality and displacement in Aceh province, Indonesia. , 2006, Disasters.

[48]  J. Christopher,et al.  Development of an Interviewer Training Manual for a Cervical Health Project on the Apsáalooke Reservation , 2005, Health promotion practice.

[49]  Anne H. Gauthier,et al.  The Promises of Comparative Research , 2002, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch.

[50]  R. Jowell Measuring attitudes cross-nationally : lessons from the European social survey , 2007 .

[51]  Piyadasa Kodituwakku,et al.  Symptoms and coping in Sri Lanka 20–21 months after the 2004 tsunami , 2008, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[52]  Mladen Victor Wickerhauser,et al.  Sampling and Estimation , 2010 .

[53]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  Choosing the Method of Data Collection , 2008 .

[54]  Margaret C. Harrell,et al.  Data Collection Methods , 2009 .

[55]  N. Kass,et al.  Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[56]  Janet Harkness,et al.  In pursuit of quality: Issues for cross-national survey research , 1999 .

[57]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[58]  Claire Gilbert Foster,et al.  International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects , 1994 .

[59]  F. Vijver,et al.  Cross-Cultural Survey Methods , 2002 .