Development of a new correlation to determine the static Young’s modulus

The estimation of the in situ stresses is very crucial in oil and gas industry applications. Prior knowledge of the in situ stresses is essential in the design of hydraulic fracturing operations in conventional and unconventional reservoirs. The fracture propagation and fracture mapping are strong functions of the values and directions of the in situ stresses. Other applications such as drilling require the knowledge of the in situ stresses to avoid the wellbore instability problems. The estimation of the in situ stresses requires the knowledge of the Static Young’s modulus of the rock. Young’s modulus can be determined using expensive techniques by measuring the Young’s modulus on actual cores in the laboratory. The laboratory values are then used to correlate the dynamic values derived from the logs. Several correlations were introduced in the literature, but those correlations were very specific and when applied to different cases they gave very high errors and were limited to relating the dynamic Young’ modulus with the log data. The objective of this paper is to develop an accurate and robust correlation for static Young’s modulus to be estimated directly from log data without the need for core measurements. Multiple regression analysis was performed on actual core and log data using 600 data points to develop the new correlations. The static Young’s modulus was found to be a strong function on three log parameters, namely compressional transit time, shear transit time, and bulk density. The new correlation was tested for different cases with different lithology such as calcite, dolomite, and sandstone. It gave good match to the measured data in the laboratory which indicates the accuracy and robustness of this correlation. In addition, it outperformed all correlations from the literature in predicting the static Young’s modulus. It will also help in saving time as well as cost because only the available log data are used in the prediction.

[1]  J. B. Walsh.  Seismic wave attenuation in rock due to friction , 1966 .

[2]  Gholam Reza Lashkaripour,et al.  Empirical relations between strength and static and dynamic elastic properties of Asmari and Sarvak limestones, two main oil reservoirs in Iran , 2015 .

[3]  M. S. King.  Wave Velocities in Rocks as a Function of Changes in Overburden Pressure and Pore Fluid Saturants , 1966 .

[4]  M. Eliwa,et al.  Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods , 2013 .

[5]  D. F. Howarth.  Apparatus to determine static and dynamic elastic moduli , 1984 .

[6]  Technical Note Apparatus to Determine Static and Dynamic Elastic Moduli By , 1984 .

[7]  E. A. Eissa,et al.  Relation between static and dynamic Young's moduli of rocks , 1988 .

[8]  B. Guo,et al.  An Analytical Solution of Fracture-Induced Stress and Its Application in Shale Gas Exploitation , 2014 .

[9]  J. M. Ide,et al.  Comparison of Statically and Dynamically Determined Young's Modulus of Rocks. , 1936, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Matteo Ciccotti,et al.  Differences between static and dynamic elastic moduli of a typical seismogenic rock , 2004 .

[11]  Y. Abousleiman,et al.  Analyses of Wellbore Instability in Drilling Through Chemically Active Fractured-Rock Formations , 2009 .

[12]  H. Ledbetter.  Dynamic vs. static Young's moduli: a case study , 1993 .

[13]  W. Brace.  Relation of elastic properties of rocks to fabric , 1965 .

[14]  Zhou Desheng,et al.  Induced Stress and Interaction of Fractures During Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Formation , 2015 .

[15]  H.R.G.K. Hack,et al.  Seismic Methods in Engineering Geology , 1984 .

[16]  M. S. King.  STATIC AND DYNAMIC ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF ROCKS FROM THE CANADIAN SHIELD , 1983 .

[17]  David M. Rocke,et al.  The Distribution of Robust Distances , 2005 .

[18]  D. M. McCann,et al.  Determination of Young’s modulus of the rock mass from geophysical well logs , 1992, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[19]  Desheng Zhou,et al.  Analysis of Leak-off Tests in Shallow Marine Sediments , 2002 .

[20]  S. F. Crary,et al.  Enhanced in-situ stress profiling with microfracture, core, and sonic-logging data , 1991 .

[21]  R. H. Morales,et al.  Fracturing of High-Permeability Formations: Mechanical Properties Correlations , 1993 .

[22]  M. Hood,et al.  Rock Properties and Their Effect on Thermally Induced Displacements and Stresses , 1980 .

[23]  E. Fjær,et al.  Drilling Time Reduction Through an Integrated Rock Mechanics Analysis , 2012 .

[24]  C. Chen,et al.  ADVANCES IN HETEROGENEOUS MATERIAL MECHANICS 2008 , 2008 .