Estimating mammalian species richness and occupancy in tropical forest canopies with arboreal camera traps

Large and medium-bodied rainforest canopy mammals are typically surveyed using line transects, but these are labour intensive and usually ignore nocturnal species. Camera traps have become the preferred tool for assessing terrestrial mammal communities, but have rarely been used for arboreal species. Here, we compare the efficiency of arboreal camera trapping with line transects for inventorying medium and large-sized arboreal mammals, and assess the viability of using camera traps in trees to model habitat occupancy. We installed 42 camera traps, spaced 2 km apart, in the canopy of the Maijuna-Kichwa Regional Conservation Area, Peru and walked 2014 km of diurnal line transects on 22 trails at the same site. We compared the efficiency of each method using species accumulation curves. We applied a multi-species occupancy model, while examining the effect of camera height on detection probabilities, including the distance from a village and from a river as covariates to examine variability in habitat occupancy. In 3147 camera days, 18 species of arboreal medium and large-sized mammals were detected by cameras, while 11 species were recorded on line transects. Ten of these species were detected by both methods. Diurnal species were detected more quickly and with less effort using arboreal camera trapping than using diurnal line transects at the same site, although some species were more easily detected during line transects. Habitat occupancy was positively correlated with distance from the village for two species, and negatively correlated with distance from the river for one. Detection probabilities increased modestly with camera height. Practical limitations of arboreal camera trapping include the requirement for specialized climbing techniques, as well as increased potential for false triggers, requiring extended processing time. Arboreal camera trapping is an efficient method for inventorying arboreal mammals and a viable option for studying their distribution relative to environmental or anthropogenic variables when abundance or density estimates are not required.

[1]  Tremaine Gregory,et al.  Records of Coendou ichillus (Rodentia, Erethizontidae) from the Lower Urubamba Region of Peru , 2015, ZooKeys.

[2]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Tigers on trails: occupancy modeling for cluster sampling. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Alfonso Alonso,et al.  Arboreal camera trapping: taking a proven method to new heights , 2014 .

[4]  M. Graipel,et al.  Activity pattern of Atlantic Forest small arboreal mammals as revealed by camera traps , 2008, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[5]  C. Peres,et al.  Mammal assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[6]  T. Otani,et al.  Measuring fig foraging frequency of the Yakushima macaque by using automatic cameras , 2001, Ecological Research.

[7]  Jorge A. Ahumada,et al.  Monitoring the Status and Trends of Tropical Forest Terrestrial Vertebrate Communities from Camera Trap Data: A Tool for Conservation , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  K. Nekaris,et al.  Conservation Assessments of Arboreal Mammals in Difficult Terrain: Occupancy Modeling of Pileated Gibbons (Hylobates pileatus) , 2013, International Journal of Primatology.

[9]  M. Dubois,et al.  Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and relative abundance in Neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: what is the minimal effort required? , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[10]  R. Kays,et al.  Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research , 2014, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[11]  M. Passamani,et al.  Time-lags in primate occupancy: a study case using dynamic models , 2015 .

[12]  G. Jones,et al.  Camera Trap Observations of Nonhabituated Critically Endangered Wild Blonde Capuchins, Sapajus flavius (Formerly Cebus flavius) , 2014, International Journal of Primatology.

[13]  Jamie McCallum,et al.  Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types , 2013 .

[14]  Joshua M. Linder,et al.  Differential impact of bushmeat hunting on monkey species and implications for primate conservation in Korup National Park, Cameroon , 2011 .

[15]  S. Buckland Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[16]  M. Tobler,et al.  An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals , 2008 .

[17]  Louise H. Emmons,et al.  Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforests : a preliminary assessment. Bulletin of the AMNH ; no. 230 , 1996 .

[18]  T. O'Brien,et al.  Using occupancy‐based surveys and multi‐model inference to estimate abundance and distribution of crested gibbons (Nomascus spp.) in central Laos , 2016, American journal of primatology.

[19]  C. Peres,et al.  Game vertebrate extraction in African and Neotropical forests: An intercontinental comparison , 2001 .

[20]  Larissa L. Bailey,et al.  Primates and Cameras , 2014, International Journal of Primatology.

[21]  R. Jenkins,et al.  The potential of occupancy modelling as a tool for monitoring wild primate populations , 2012 .

[22]  M. Willig,et al.  Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight , 2016, PLoS biology.

[23]  R. Kays,et al.  Arboreal tropical forest vertebrates: current knowledge and research trends , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[24]  Michael Schaub,et al.  Bayesian Population Analysis using WinBUGS: A Hierarchical Perspective , 2011 .

[25]  C. Biancardi,et al.  Monitoring small and arboreal mammals by camera traps: effectiveness and applications , 2012, Acta Theriologica.

[26]  J. Duckworth The difficulty of estimating population densities of nocturnal forest mammals from transect counts of animals , 1998 .

[27]  M. Tobler,et al.  Spatiotemporal hierarchical modelling of species richness and occupancy using camera trap data , 2015 .

[28]  G. Mace,et al.  The 2010 Biodiversity Indicators: Challenges for Science and Policy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  S. Jansa,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships of New World Porcupines (Rodentia, Erethizontidae): Implications for Taxonomy, Morphological Evolution, and Biogeography , 2013 .

[30]  Timothy G. O'Brien,et al.  The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels , 2010 .

[31]  C. Peres Effects of Subsistence Hunting on Vertebrate Community Structure in Amazonian Forests , 2000 .

[32]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Modelling community dynamics based on species‐level abundance models from detection/nondetection data , 2011 .

[33]  J. Ahumada,et al.  Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Design and Analysis of Line Transect Surveys for Primates , 2010, International Journal of Primatology.

[35]  Jorge A. Ahumada,et al.  Estimating Species Richness and Modelling Habitat Preferences of Tropical Forest Mammals from Camera Trap Data , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Mewa Singh,et al.  The influence of differing hunting practices on the relative abundance of mammals in two rainforest areas of the Western Ghats, India , 2004, Oryx.

[37]  M. Lowman,et al.  Treetops at Risk , 2013, Springer New York.

[38]  T. Arnold,et al.  Considerations for using occupancy surveys to monitor forest primates: a case study with Sclater’s monkey (Cercopithecus sclateri) , 2011, Population Ecology.

[39]  Paula A. Pebsworth,et al.  Advancing Primate Research and Conservation Through the Use of Camera Traps: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2014, International Journal of Primatology.

[40]  C. Peres,et al.  Density compensation in neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity , 2000, Oecologia.

[41]  M. Keller,et al.  Estimating Canopy Structure in an Amazon Forest from Laser Range Finder and IKONOS Satellite Observations1 , 2002 .

[42]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[43]  M. Passamani,et al.  Local vs landscape drivers of primate occupancy in a Brazilian fragmented region , 2015, Mammal Research.

[44]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[46]  K. A. I. Nekaris,et al.  Conservation implications of low encounter rates of five nocturnal primate species (Nycticebus spp.) in Asia , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[47]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability. , 2006, Ecology.

[48]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Multi-species occurrence models to evaluate the effects of conservation and management actions , 2010 .

[49]  T. King,et al.  Arboreal camera trapping for the Critically Endangered greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus , 2012, Oryx.

[50]  Colin A. Chapman,et al.  Tree Climbing Strategies for Primate Ecological Studies , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[51]  D. Dawson,et al.  Occupancy in continuous habitat , 2012 .

[52]  M. Lowman FOREST CANOPIES: Methods, Hypotheses, and Future Directions , 1996 .

[53]  C. Peres,et al.  Terrestrial mammal responses to edges in Amazonian forest patches: a study based on track stations , 2008 .

[54]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Cryptic mammals caught on camera: assessing the utility of range wide camera trap data for conserving the endangered Asian tapir , 2013 .