The Influence of Participants' Personality on Quantitative and Qualitative Metrics in Usability Testing

We present the results of a usability study with 35 participants investigating the influence of personality on various metrics used in usability engineering. We conduct a task based usability test with a website integrating tasks of various difficulty and measure performance metrics like task completion rate and time on task. We also use standard questionnaire based usability metrics like the System Usability Scale. Furthermore, we gather qualitative data via open-ended questions and count the number of words as well as the mentions of positive and negative aspects. We measure personality using the well-known big five model, also often referred to as OCEAN model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) and three basic needs (need for influence and power, need for recognition and performance, need for security and tranquility). We analyze the relationship between personality and usability metrics via correlations and regression models. We identify multiple significant results and show that in our study the personality correlated with some of the usability metrics we inspected. Extraversion and the need for influence and power show the most and strongest correlations. Furthermore, we also show that regression models based on personality traits can explain up to 37% of the variance in usability metrics. The results have implications for the improvement of the selection process of usability test participants as well as for the interpretation of test results. We discuss these implications and give an outlook on further research in this area.

[1]  D. Whitten,et al.  The Chief Information Security Officer: An Analysis of the Skills Required for Success , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[2]  I. B. Myers The myers-briggs type indicator , 1962 .

[3]  Marie Christine Roy,et al.  The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers , 2001, Internet Res..

[4]  A. Furnham The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality , 1996 .

[5]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Culture and usability evaluation: the effects of culture in structured interviews , 2006 .

[6]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[7]  C. Dancey,et al.  Statistics Without Maths For Psychology , 1999 .

[8]  J. Asendorpf,et al.  Persönlichkeit im Kulturvergleich , 2012 .

[9]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[10]  David J. Pittenger,et al.  Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 2005 .

[11]  Udo Konradt,et al.  Usability in online shops: scale construction, validation and the influence on the buyers’ intention and decision , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  The influence of personality on three aspects of cognitive performance: processing speed, intelligence and school performance , 2001 .

[13]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[14]  Melinda Korzaan,et al.  The Influence of Personality Traits and Information Privacy Concerns on Behavioral Intentions , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Scott P. King,et al.  Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator , 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[16]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[17]  H. Murray Explorations in personality : a clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age , 1939 .

[18]  Jürgen Sauer,et al.  The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  G.E. Burnett,et al.  Personality as A-Criterion for Selecting Usability Testing Participants , 2006, 2006 ITI 4th International Conference on Information & Communications Technology.

[20]  G. Boyle Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some Psychometric Limitations , 1995 .

[21]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference , 2001 .

[22]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures , 2009, Ergonomics.

[23]  H. Fishbein,et al.  The Influence of Personality on Workplace Bullying and Discrimination , 2006 .

[24]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[25]  Briony D. Pulford,et al.  The influence of personality on HE students’ confidence in their academic abilities , 2006 .

[26]  Mark Batey,et al.  Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity , 2010 .

[27]  Christian Wolff,et al.  personality and information behavior in web search , 2016, ASIST.

[28]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Joar Vittersø,et al.  Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Wolmet Barendregt,et al.  Predicting effectiveness of children participants in user testing based on personality characteristics , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier , 1994 .

[34]  P. E. Vernon,et al.  The scientific analysis of personality , 1966 .

[35]  Adrian Bangerter,et al.  The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective , 2009 .

[36]  Jürgen Schupp,et al.  The Influence of Environment and Personality on the Affective and Cognitive Component of Subjective Well-being , 2008 .

[37]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  AIS Electronic , 2022 .

[38]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  The Impact of Personality on the Subjective Assessment of Usability , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  W. Stern Die differentielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen , 1911 .

[40]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[41]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Errors in computerized office work: differences between novice and expert users , 1991, SGCH.

[42]  James C. McElroy,et al.  The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[44]  M. Lorr An empirical evaluation of the MBTI typology , 1991 .

[45]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire , 2008, USAB.

[46]  R. Gurrea,et al.  The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of age in usability testing. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[48]  Manfred Sader Psychologie der Persönlichkeit , 1980 .