Neural Correlates of British Sign Language Comprehension: Spatial Processing Demands of Topographic Language

In all signed languages used by deaf people, signs are executed in sign space in front of the body. Some signed sentences use this space to map detailed real-world spatial relationships directly. Such sentences can be considered to exploit sign space topographically. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we explored the extent to which increasing the topographic processing demands of signed sentences was reflected in the differential recruitment of brain regions in deaf and hearing native signers of the British Sign Language. When BSL signers performed a sentence anomaly judgement task, the occipito-temporal junction was activated bilaterally to a greater extent for topographic than nontopo-graphic processing. The differential role of movement in the processing of the two sentence types may account for this finding. In addition, enhanced activation was observed in the left inferior and superior parietal lobules during processing of topographic BSL sentences. We argue that the left parietal lobe is specifically involved in processing the precise configuration and location of hands in space to represent objects, agents, and actions. Importantly, no differences in these regions were observed when hearing people heard and saw English translations of these sentences. Despite the high degree of similarity in the neural systems underlying signed and spoken languages, exploring the linguistic features which are unique to each of these broadens our understanding of the systems involved in language comprehension.

[1]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Neural Systems Underlying Spatial Language in American Sign Language , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  P. McGuire,et al.  Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  K. Emmorey Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights From Sign Language Research , 2001 .

[4]  M. Hallett,et al.  Comparison of Auditory, Somatosensory, and Visually Instructed and Internally Generated Finger Movements: A PET Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Cortical Correlates of Gesture Processing: Clues to the Cerebral Mechanisms Underlying Apraxia during the Imitation of Meaningless Gestures , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Damasio,et al.  Neural Correlates of Naming Actions and of Naming Spatial Relations , 2001, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  M J Brammer,et al.  Dispersed activation in the left temporal cortex for speech-reading in congenitally deaf people , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T A Carpenter,et al.  Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[10]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[11]  J. Risberg,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of signed language. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[12]  J B Poline,et al.  Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D. Tranel,et al.  A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION BETWEEN LINGUISTIC AND PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The Neural Bases of Strategy and Skill in Sentence–Picture Verification , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[16]  E. M. van den Bogaerde,et al.  Input and interaction in deaf families , 2000 .

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Kemmerer “Near” and “far” in language and perception , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  William F. Eddy,et al.  Time Course of fMRI-Activation in Language and Spatial Networks during Sentence Comprehension , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial biasafter right hemisphere lesions , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Peter W. McOwan,et al.  Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Rachel Sutton-Spence,et al.  The Linguistics of BSL: An Introduction , 1999 .

[23]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  P. Fox,et al.  Intersubject variability of functional areas in the human visual cortex , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[28]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[29]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Neural Systems Mediating American Sign Language: Effects of Sensory Experience and Age of Acquisition , 1997, Brain and Language.

[30]  H. Poizner,et al.  Fractionation of the components of role play in a right-hemispheric lesioned signer , 1997 .

[31]  S C Williams,et al.  Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Language, Gesture, and Space. , 1996 .

[33]  R. Jackendoff The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface , 1996 .

[34]  Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen,et al.  Space in Danish sign language : the semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language , 1993 .

[35]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Neural basis of language and motor behaviour: Perspectives from American Sign Language , 1992 .

[36]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[37]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.