Parameter identification using optimization techniques in open-channel inverse problems

Adverse socio-economic impacts of recent floods both in Europe and other continents emphasize the need for accurate flood forecasting capabilities towards improved flood risk management services. Flood forecasting models are often data-intensive. These models are inherited with (i) conceptual parameters that often cannot be assessed by field measurements, as in conceptual models; and/or (ii) empirical parameters that their direct measurements are either difficult, for example, roughness coefficient or costly, for example, survey data. There is also a category of practical problems, where modelling is required but gauged data are not available. Models, other than purely theoretical ones, for example, Large Eddy Simulation models, need calibration and the problem is even more pronounced in the case of ungauged rivers. Optimal values of these parameters in a mathematical sense can be identified by a number of techniques as discussed and applied in this paper. New generations of satellites are now able to provide observation data that can be useful to implement these techniques. This paper presents the results of synthesized flood data emulating data obtained from remote sensing. A one-dimensional, steady-state flow in a channel of simple geometry is studied. The paper uses optimization methods and the Extended Kalman Filter to ascertain/improve the values of the parameters.

[1]  Michel Carlier Hydraulique générale et appliquée , 1972 .

[3]  E. Todini,et al.  A solution to the inverse problem in groundwater hydrology based on Kalman filtering , 1996 .

[4]  Diane M. McKnight,et al.  Transport and cycling of iron and hydrogen peroxide in a freshwater stream: Influence of organic acids , 2003 .

[5]  Ecmwf Newsletter,et al.  EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS , 2004 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[7]  E. Todini,et al.  Towards a comprehensive physically-based rainfall-runoff model , 2002 .

[8]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[9]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[10]  N. Arnell,et al.  Data assimilation applied to hydraulic parameter identification. , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Ghil,et al.  Dynamical Properties of Error Statistics in a Shallow-Water Model , 1993 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[13]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[14]  H. Madsen,et al.  Comparison of extended and ensemble Kalman filters for data assimilation in coastal area modelling , 1999 .

[15]  Keith Beven,et al.  Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps , 2003 .

[16]  Mgf Werner Uncertainty in flood extent estimation due to uncertain parameters , 2001 .

[17]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  An integrated approach to hydrologic data assimilation: interpolation, smoothing, and filtering , 2002 .

[18]  H. J. Vested,et al.  Developments in Operational Shelf Sea Modelling in Danish Waters , 2001 .

[19]  J. Hadamard,et al.  Le problème de Cauchy et les équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques : leçons professées à l'Université Yale , 1932 .

[20]  J. L. Roux An Introduction to the Kalman Filter , 2003 .

[21]  Ezio Todini,et al.  TOPKAPI: a model for the representation of the rainfall‐runoff process at different scales , 2002 .