Structure-function coupling in the human connectome: A machine learning approach

While the function of most biological systems is tightly constrained by their structure, current evidence suggests that coupling between the structure and function of brain networks is relatively modest. We aimed to investigate whether the modest coupling between connectome structure and function is a fundamental property of nervous systems or a limitation of current brain network models. We developed a new deep learning framework to predict an individual's brain function from their structural connectome, achieving prediction accuracies that substantially exceeded state-of-the-art biophysical models (group: R=0.9±0.1=0.9±0.1, individual: R=0.55±0.1). Crucially, brain function predicted from an individual's structural connectome explained significant inter-individual variation in cognitive performance. Our results suggest that structure-function coupling in human brain networks is substantially tighter than previously suggested. We establish the margin by which current brain network models can be improved and demonstrate how deep learning can facilitate investigation of fundamental relations between brain function and behavior.

[1]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  Enrico Amico,et al.  Mapping higher-order relations between brain structure and function with embedded vector representations of connectomes , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Breakspear Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior , 2019, NeuroImage.

[8]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Linking Structure and Function in Macroscale Brain Networks , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  Mapping connectomes with diffusion MRI: deterministic or probabilistic tractography? , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Computational psychiatry , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Alan Anticevic,et al.  Biophysical Modeling of Large-Scale Brain Dynamics and Applications for Computational Psychiatry. , 2018, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[14]  Graham L. Baum,et al.  Development of structure–function coupling in human brain networks during youth , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  John D. Murray,et al.  Cortical Circuit Models in Psychiatry: Linking Disrupted Excitation-Inhibition Balance to Cognitive Deficits Associated With Schizophrenia , 2018 .

[18]  Maria Giulia Preti,et al.  Decoupling of brain function from structure reveals regional behavioral specialization in humans , 2019, Nature Communications.

[19]  Lukasz Kaiser,et al.  Attention is All you Need , 2017, NIPS.

[20]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network-Level Structure-Function Relationships in Human Neocortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Mapping connectomes with diffusion MRI: Deterministic or probabilistic tractography? , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Hierarchical Heterogeneity across Human Cortex Shapes Large-Scale Neural Dynamics , 2018, Neuron.

[24]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Deco,et al.  Inversion of a large-scale circuit model reveals a cortical hierarchy in the dynamic resting human brain , 2019, Science Advances.

[27]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior , 2019, NeuroImage.

[29]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[30]  Graham L. Baum,et al.  Development of structure–function coupling in human brain networks during youth , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[32]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Virtual in Vivo Interactive Dissection of White Matter Fasciculi in the Human Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Communication dynamics in complex brain networks , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[37]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  William A. Sethares,et al.  Rethinking Measures of Functional Connectivity via Feature Extraction , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[40]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Computational Psychiatry , 2014, Neuron.

[41]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[42]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamically evolves on multiple time-scales over a static structural connectome: Models and mechanisms , 2017, NeuroImage.

[43]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome , 2020, bioRxiv.

[44]  Laura E. Suárez,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Diversity of meso-scale architecture in human and non-human connectomes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[46]  Boris C. Bernhardt,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. , 2020, Nature neuroscience.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Biophysical models of fMRI responses , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[51]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[52]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[53]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[54]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Cooperative and Competitive Spreading Dynamics on the Human Connectome , 2015, Neuron.

[55]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Navigation of brain networks , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Spectral mapping of brain functional connectivity from diffusion imaging , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[57]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Fashion Safety Hot Sale Running Shoes Sport Men Soccer wqp8Zq - inversiontablepro.com , 2018 .

[59]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[60]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[61]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[62]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[63]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome , 2020, Network Neuroscience.