Variability of consecutive in vivo MR flow measurements in the main portal vein.

OBJECTIVE The variability of consecutive cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements could significantly affect their use for clinical decisions, especially during provocative testing. The purposes of this study were to determine the normal variability of flow and consecutive flow measurements in the main portal vein on MR images and to determine how intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, and MR imager variability affect these measurements. SUBJECTS AND METHODS MR flow measurements were acquired four consecutive times at the same location in the main portal vein of 12 subjects and three consecutive times at the same location in a nonpulsatile vessel model. All acquisitions were completed within 10 min. All main portal vein MR data sets were evaluated manually in a blinded review by two independent observers during three separate sessions spaced a mean of 4.5 weeks apart. Flow model data sets were evaluated during a single session by one observer. Variabilities were subsequently calculated by a components-of-variance analysis and by the coefficient of variation (SD/mean x 100). RESULTS Of the total variance, 90% was due to flow variability among subjects (intersubject), 6% to flow variability within one subject (intrasubject), 2% to intraobserver variability, and 2% to interobserver variability. The coefficient of variation of consecutive MR portal vein flow measurements within a single subject was 11% +/- 5% (range, 3-23%). Intra- and interobserver variabilities were 5% +/- 2% (range, 1-11%) and 4% +/- 4% (range, 0-17%), respectively. MR imager variability was 1% +/- 1% (range, 0-2%). CONCLUSION The mean variability of consecutive cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements in the main portal vein is 11% +/- 5% and could affect research and clinical protocols that employ this technique.

[1]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Cine Phase‐Contrast MR Flow Measurements: Improved Precision using an Automated Method of Vessel Detection , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  M. Dauzat,et al.  Portal vein blood flow measurements using pulsed Doppler and electromagnetic flowmetry in dogs: a comparative study. , 1989, Gastroenterology.

[3]  N J Pelc,et al.  Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  C. Higgins,et al.  Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  A. Weaver,et al.  Evaluation of portal venous hypertension with cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements: high association of hyperdynamic portal flow with variceal hemorrhage. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  C. Higgins,et al.  Severity of aortic regurgitation: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[7]  C. Higgins,et al.  Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  N J Pelc,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Blood Flow with a Phase Subtraction Technique: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[9]  C. Radhakrishna Rao,et al.  Estimation of Variance Components. , 1979 .

[10]  K. Ota,et al.  Effects of nifedipine on hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal vein blood flow in patients with cirrhosis , 1995, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[11]  C. Higgins,et al.  Right and left lung perfusion: in vitro and in vivo validation with oblique-angle, velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  C. Higgins,et al.  Quantification of Collateral Blood Flow in Coarctation of the Aorta by Velocity Encoded Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1994, Circulation.

[13]  N J Pelc,et al.  Simultaneous temporal resolution of cardiac and respiratory motion in MR imaging. , 1995, Radiology.

[14]  N J Pelc,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[15]  S. Holland,et al.  Doppler US. Part I. Basic principles, instrumentation, and pitfalls. , 1990, Radiology.

[16]  N. Yoshimoto,et al.  Aortic regurgitation: quantitation with MR imaging velocity mapping. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  R. Ehman,et al.  MR measurements of mesenteric venous flow: prospective evaluation in healthy volunteers and patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. , 1995, Radiology.