Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography

Objective. Ultrasound examination is an objective method for assessment of uterine scar defects. The present study was conducted to compare single‐layer interrupted sutures (Group A) with double‐layer interrupted sutures (Group B) and our new method (Group C) as well as other perioperative parameters in relation to risk of wedge defects in scars. Methods. We have introduced a new myometrium closure procedure consisting of continuous suture with decidual closure followed by interrupted myometrium suture. In this prospective study, women undergoing cesarean operation (n=137) were examined by transvaginal ultrasound one month after surgery to assess the appearance of lower uterine scars. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations of perioperative parameters and methods for lower myometrium closure with abnormal wedge formation. Results. Wedge defects were observed in a total of 27 patients (19.7%). The analysis revealed Groups B and C to have reduced risks with odds ratios of 0.28 and 0.077, respectively, as compared to Group A. Furthermore, increasing gestational week at delivery, plural fetal pregnancies, premature rupture of membranes and pre‐eclampsia were also linked with an increased risk, with odds ratios of 1.4–8.9. Conclusion. The incidence of uterine scar defects 1 month after cesarean sections varies with the method applied for myometrial suture and perioperative variables. The data suggest that methods for myometrium closure as well as other factors influence the condition of myometrial healing.

[1]  P. Barlow,et al.  Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  K. Hillaby,et al.  First‐trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  B. V. Van Voorhis,et al.  Detection of Cesarean Scars by Transvaginal Ultrasound , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  E. Hamilton,et al.  The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Can Joel‐Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity? , 2001, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  A. Thurmond,et al.  Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  F. Goffinet,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus , 1996, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Paul,et al.  Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Jelsema,et al.  Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[13]  J. Hauth,et al.  Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  H. Y. Chen,et al.  Observation of cesarean section scar by transvaginal ultrasonography. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  W. Hannah,et al.  Classical versus low‐segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies , 1988, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  S. Clark,et al.  Placenta Previa/Accreta and Prior Cesarean Section , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.