Blending for Student Engagement: Lessons Learned for MOOCs and Beyond.

The purpose of this ongoing, three-year action research study is to explore the digital challenges of student engagement in higher education within the experimental platform of blended learning. Research questions examine the role of digital innovation in supporting diverse learners, as well as building meaningful connections with technology for undergraduate teacher education students. Results from qualitative data collected through instructor journals and field notes and student mid-term and exit surveys during year one, indicate blended learning can be effective for modelling how to use technology to shift learners towards more active agency. The immediacy of the localised university classroom delivered a viable research setting for digital experimentation, while providing a significant lived experience for undergraduates to springboard their future technological practices with K–12 students. Four pedagogical opportunities for digital intentionality in virtual spaces emerged during data analysis and are shared as considerations for future innovation: (1) designing digital resources, (2) scaffolding student learning, (3) learner customisation, and (4) promoting the lived experience. Lessons learned could be effective in helping develop higher quality educational experiences for on-campus students, as well as scaffolding greater engagement in online formats involving more global populations (e.g., massive online open courses – MOOCs).

[1]  J. Bruner.  The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[2]  R. B. Johnson.  Examining the Validity Structure of Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[3]  Bryan Mann.  The One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimaginedby Salman Khan. New York: Twelve, 2012. 272 pp., $26.99. , 2014 .

[4]  John C. Hayek,et al.  What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Rebecca Francis,et al.  Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes , 2013 .

[7]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[8]  Ines Casanovas,et al.  Exploring the Current Theoretical Background About Adoption Until Institutionalization of Online Education in Universities: Needs for Further Research , 2009 .

[9]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[10]  Jillianne Code,et al.  Realigning Higher Education for the 21st-Century Learner through Multi-Access Learning , 2013 .

[11]  N. Vaughan.  Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education , 2007 .

[12]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Ron Owston,et al.  Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Josh McCarthy,et al.  Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience , 2010 .

[15]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[16]  J. Wesley Baker,et al.  The "Classroom Flip": Using Web Course Management Tools to Become the Guide by the Side , 2000 .

[17]  C. Dziuban,et al.  Blended learning: A dangerous idea? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  P. Schuetz.  A Theory-Driven Model of Community College Student Engagement , 2008 .

[19]  Patrice M. Bain,et al.  The Value of Applied Research: Retrieval Practice Improves Classroom Learning and Recommendations from a Teacher, a Principal, and a Scientist , 2012 .

[20]  G. Veletsianos.  A Small-Scale Adventure Learning Activity and its Implications for Higher Education Practice and Research , 2013 .

[21]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[22]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Student engagement evidence summary , 2010 .

[23]  D. Polkinghorne.  Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .

[24]  B. Skinner.  Is it behaviorism? , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  Lynn Bell.  Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology: Perspectives of the Leaders of Twelve National Education Associations , 2001 .

[26]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy , 1995 .

[27]  E. Kahu.  Framing student engagement in higher education , 2013 .

[28]  Sheryl Burgstahler,et al.  Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Second Edition. , 2008 .

[29]  C. Bryson,et al.  The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning , 2007 .

[30]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[31]  Steve Drew,et al.  The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: the need for better understanding of academic blended practice , 2013 .

[32]  David Robinson,et al.  Using technology to direct learning in higher education , 2009 .

[33]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Introduction : Inquiry and Participation in Search of a World Worthy of Human Aspiration , 2010 .