Crystallizing Local Political Knowledge for Informed Public Participation

Municipal governments often struggle to inform and engage citizens around local issues. Due to complexities of local politics and the diverse expressions in public and private spheres, citizens face a huge information barrier towards meaningful participation. To overcome such barrier, we explore a solution to provide citizens with clear, useful, and trustworthy information. We describe a framework for accomplishing this goal through issue-based knowledge crystallization. In order to put this framework into test, we devised Community Issue Review (CIR) as a concrete process for crystallizing local political knowledge. CIR is a structured deliberative process that use a citizen panel to conduct analysis of data relevant to a pending issue. We describe CIR in three aspects of its functions: institutional design, deliberative process, and productive outcome. Three special characteristics of CIR are emphasized: (1) fully embedded within local decision-making context; (2) hybrid (face-to-face and online) deliberation; (3) facilitation on collaborative decision-analysis. We present the iterative design of the CIR process and the lessons learned from field practices in a local community.

[1]  S. Chambers,et al.  DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY , 2003 .

[2]  Jessica Kropczynski Understanding the Roles of Artifacts in Democratic Deliberation from the Citizens' Initiative Review , 2015 .

[3]  B. Noble,et al.  Informational Barriers to Effective Policy-Public Communication: A Case Study of Wind Energy Planning in Saskatchewan, Canada , 2013 .

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[5]  H. L. Resnikoff Concurrent Computer and Human Information Processing , 1987 .

[6]  Chris North,et al.  Analytic provenance: process+interaction+insight , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Christiane Eilders,et al.  A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research , 2015 .

[8]  Niklas Gudowsky,et al.  The Role of Information in Public Participation , 2013 .

[9]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Encouraging civic participation through local news aggregation , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[10]  Loni Hagen,et al.  Introducing textual analysis tools for policy informatics: a case study of e-petitions , 2015, DG.O.

[11]  Dimitris Askounis,et al.  Supporting public decision making in policy deliberations: an ontological approach , 2011, Oper. Res..

[12]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[13]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Latent Community Topic Analysis: Integration of Community Discovery with Topic Modeling , 2012, TIST.

[14]  Christopher W. Moore The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict , 1996 .

[15]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Opinion quality in public opinion research , 1997 .

[16]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  A Model Building Tool to Support Group Deliberation (eDelib): A Research Note , 2007 .

[17]  John Gastil,et al.  Making Direct Democracy Deliberative through Random Assemblies* , 2013 .

[18]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  John Gastil,et al.  The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Civic Engagement In The Twenty-First Century , 2005 .