Indexing research: an approach to grounding ingarden's ontological framework

Attempts to produce an adequate and long-lived subject indexing system for information systems research have failed. In this paper we seek to address this by proposing an approach by which the terms expressed in research literature, such as those in the information systems literature, can be systematically and meaningfully categorised. The approach is significant in that it draws upon rigorous and philosophically compatible bodies of work in two areas. Firstly, we draw on work addressing the nature, existence, and categorisation of literary expression found in research papers (Roman Ingarden’s ontological analysis of the scientific work of art). Secondly, we draw from qualitative research methods addressing how meaningful categories can be analysed from text and related to each other (grounded theory). The resulting approach has the potential to be applied in many scientific disciplines beyond information systems, and to form the intellectual core of an information tool in e-research.

[1]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Objective quality ranking of computing journals , 2003, CACM.

[2]  Roman Ingarden,et al.  Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks , 1970 .

[3]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[4]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  The Grounded Theory Method and Case Study Data in IS Research: Issues and Design , 2005 .

[5]  Amie L. Thomasson.  Fiction and Intentionality , 1996 .

[6]  Harold T. Betteridge,et al.  Cassell's German-English, English-German Dictionary , 1978 .

[7]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Basic Tools of Formal Ontology , 1998 .

[8]  George G. Grabowicz,et al.  The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature , 1974 .

[9]  C HardgraveBill,et al.  Forums for information systems scholars , 2001 .

[10]  Peter Tarasewich,et al.  Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research , 2002, CACM.

[11]  Nick F. Pidgeon,et al.  The Use of Grounded Theory for Conceptual Analysis in Knowledge Elicitation , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[13]  Pairin Katerattanakul,et al.  IS Journal Rankings Versus Citation Analysis: Consistency and Concerns , 2003, AMCIS.

[14]  K. Peffers,et al.  Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals , 2003 .

[15]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Grounded Theory: never knowingly understood , 2000 .

[16]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Information Systems Subject Indexing , 2003 .

[17]  R. Ingarden,et al.  The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art , 1974 .

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[19]  C. Urquhart.  An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[20]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign , 1999, MIS Q..

[21]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  The reality of information systems research , 2004 .

[22]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for information systems scholars: III , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[23]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[24]  B. Glaser.  Doing grounded theory : issues and discussions , 1998 .

[25]  Bg Glaser,et al.  The grounded theory perspective Theoretical coding. , 2005 .

[26]  Merilyn Annells,et al.  Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism , 1996 .