Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios

Uncertainties in our understanding of current and future climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities are structured by scientists using scenarios, which are generally in qualitative (narrative) and quantitative (numerical) forms. Although conceptually strong, qualitative and quantitative scenarios have limited complementarity due to the lack of a fundamental bridge between two different concepts of uncertainty: linguistic and epistemic. Epistemic uncertainty is represented by the range of scenarios and linguistic variables within them, while linguistic uncertainty is represented by the translation of those linguistic variables via the fuzzy set approach. Both are therefore incorporated in the models that utilise the final quantifications. The application of this method is demonstrated in a stakeholder-led development of socioeconomic scenarios. The socioeconomic scenarios include several vague elements due to heterogeneous linguistic interpretations of future change on the part of stakeholders. We apply the so-called ‘Centre of Gravity’ (CoG) operator to defuzzify the quantifications of linguistic values provided by stakeholders. The results suggest that, in these cases, uniform distributions provide a close fit to the membership functions derived from ranges of values provided by stakeholders. As a result, the 90 or 95% intervals of the probability density functions are similar to the 0.1 or 0.05 degrees of membership of the linguistic values of linguistic variables. By bridging different uncertainty concepts (linguistic and epistemic uncertainties), this study offers a substantial step towards linking qualitative and quantitative scenarios.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[2]  Dave Murray-Rust,et al.  Analysing uncertainties in climate change impact assessment across sectors and scenarios , 2015, Climatic Change.

[3]  Michael Chung Kimberly Spal Bamberger,et al.  Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Development Projects , 2000 .

[4]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios , 2008 .

[6]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool , 2010 .

[7]  Kasper Kok,et al.  The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil , 2009 .

[8]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Methods for translating narrative scenarios into quantitative assessments of land use change , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  P. Harrison,et al.  Cross-sectoral impacts of climate and socio-economic change in Scotland: implications for adaptation policy , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[11]  Ian P. Holman,et al.  European participatory scenario development: strengthening the link between stories and models , 2015, Climatic Change.

[12]  R. Baeza-Yates Searching the Future , 2022 .

[13]  J. Hidalgo,et al.  Combining narratives and modelling approaches to simulate fine scale and long-term urban growth scenarios for climate adaptation , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Ian P. Holman,et al.  New European socio-economic scenarios for climate change research: operationalising concepts to extend the shared socio-economic pathways , 2018, Regional Environmental Change.

[15]  Eric Kemp-Benedict Converting qualitative assessments to quantitative assumptions: Bayes' rule and the pundit's wager , 2010 .

[16]  Thomas Henrichs,et al.  Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments , 2007 .

[17]  Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen The narrative aspect of scenario building - How story telling may give people a memory of the future , 2008, Cognition, Communication and Interaction.

[18]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Fundamentals of Probability and Judgement , 2006 .

[20]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Chapter Two Towards Guidelines for Environmental Scenario Analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Searching for the future of land: scenarios from the local to global scale , 2006 .

[22]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios , 2012 .

[23]  P. Harrison,et al.  Exploring climate change vulnerability across sectors and scenarios using indicators of impacts and coping capacity , 2014, Climatic Change.

[24]  Paula A. Harrison,et al.  Integrated modelling of urban spatial development under uncertain climate futures: A case study in Hungary , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  Eric Kemp-Benedict Going from Narrative to Number: Indicator-Driven Scenario Quantification , 2013 .

[26]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[27]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  P. Harrison,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative understanding for exploring cross-sectoral climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in Europe , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[29]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Scenarios in Global Environmental Assessments: Key characteristics and lessons for future use , 2012 .

[30]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Henk Udo,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A NOVEL APPROACH USING FUZZY SET THEORY , 2001 .

[32]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2002 .

[33]  V. Thomas,et al.  Adaptive stochastic integrated assessment modeling of optimal greenhouse gas emission reductions , 2014, Climatic Change.

[34]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  When and how to use scenario planning: A heuristic approach with illustration , 1991 .

[35]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - II , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[36]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.

[37]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[38]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[40]  Simo Sarkki,et al.  Structure in creativity: An exploratory study to analyse the effects of structuring tools on scenario workshop results , 2012 .

[41]  M. Bamberger Opportunities and challenges for integrating quantitative and qualitative research. , 2000 .

[42]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[43]  Ian P. Holman,et al.  Assessing cross-sectoral climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation: an introduction to the CLIMSAVE project , 2015, Climatic Change.

[44]  M. Trnka,et al.  Direct and indirect impacts of climate and socio-economic change in Europe: a sensitivity analysis for key land- and water-based sectors , 2015, Climatic Change.

[45]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Stakeholder integrated research (STIR): a new approach tested in climate change adaptation research , 2015, Climatic Change.

[46]  Eric Kemp-Benedict Telling better stories: strengthening the story in story and simulation , 2012 .

[47]  Heidi Christiansen Barlebo,et al.  Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  R. Rabbinge,et al.  Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making. , 1998 .

[49]  W. Haider,et al.  Eliciting stakeholder preferences: An application of qualitative and quantitative methods to shrimp aquaculture in the Indian Sundarbans , 2010 .