The Insights of DV-Based Localization Algorithms in the Wireless Sensor Networks with Duty-Cycled and Radio Irregular Sensors

Location information of nodes is the basis for many applications in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). However, most previous localization methods make the unrealistic assumption: (i) all nodes in WSN are always awake and (ii) the radio range of nodes is an ideal circle. This overlooks the common scenario that sensor nodes are duty-cycled to save energy and the radio range of nodes is irregular. In this paper we revisit the Distance-Vector-based (DV-based) positioning algorithms, particularly, Hop-Count-Ratio based Localization (HCRL) algorithm and investigate the following problems: (i) How is the relationship between the number of sleeping neighbor sensor nodes and the localization accuracy and (ii) How is the relationship between the degree of irregularity (DOI, which is a parameter of radio range irregularity) and the localization accuracy. We conduct a large number of experiments in WSNs simulator NetTopo, and find that the parameters: the number of waking nodes, DOI, anchor node density and localization error are interactional, i.e., for a given deployed static WSN, there is an optimal number of waking nodes and an optimal anchor node density which can minimize network energy consumption without losing much of the localization accuracy. Furthermore, waking up more sensor nodes cannot always help to increase the localization accuracy, which actually is different from our intuitive thinking: more waking nodes can help to increase the localization accuracy of DV-based localization algorithms.

[1]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Ad hoc positioning system (APS) , 2001, GLOBECOM'01. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Cat. No.01CH37270).

[2]  Tarek F. Abdelzaher,et al.  Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[3]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[4]  David E. Culler,et al.  Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[5]  C. Alippi,et al.  Wireless sensor networks and radio localization: a metrological analysis of the MICA2 received signal strength indicator , 2004, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[6]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[7]  Yiming Ji,et al.  Realistic radio range irregularity model and its impact on localization for wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005..

[8]  David E. Culler,et al.  Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[9]  Hyuk Lim,et al.  J-Sim: a simulation environment for wireless sensor networks , 2005, 38th Annual Simulation Symposium.

[10]  Mirjana D. Stojanovic,et al.  On efficient traffic engineering with DV-based routing protocols in DiffServ-aware IP networks , 2006 .

[11]  Hojung Cha,et al.  HCRL: A Hop-Count-Ratio based Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[12]  S. Nath,et al.  Communicating via Fireflies: Geographic Routing on Duty-Cycled Sensors , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[13]  King Lun Yiu Ad-hoc positioning system , 2008 .

[14]  Naixue Xiong,et al.  TPGF: geographic routing in wireless multimedia sensor networks , 2010, Telecommun. Syst..