Interactively Open Autonomy Unifies Two Approaches to Function

Functionality is essential to any form of anticipation beyond simple directedness at an end. In the literature on function in biology, there are two distinct approaches. One, the etiological view, places the origin of function in selection, while the other, the organizational view, individuates function by organizational role. Both approaches have well‐known advantages and disadvantages. I propose a reconciliation of the two approaches, based in an interactivist approach to the individuation and stability of organisms. The approach was suggested by Kant in the Critique of Judgment, but since it requires, on his account, the identification a new form of causation, it has not been accessible by analytical techniques. I proceed by construction of the required concept to fit certain design requirements. This construction builds on concepts introduced in my previous four talks to these meetings.

[1]  J. Collier,et al.  Supervenience and Reduction in Biological Hierarchies , 1988 .

[2]  John Collier,et al.  What is Autonomy , 2002 .

[3]  H. Maturana Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument , 1988 .

[4]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems , 1999 .

[5]  C. Nelson Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System , 2006 .

[6]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[7]  J. Collier,et al.  Autonomy and Process Closure as the Basis for Functionality , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  John D. Collier Autonomy in anticipatory systems: Significance for functionality, intentionality and meaning , 1999 .

[9]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[10]  John Collier,et al.  Self-organization, Individuation and Identity , 2004, Revue internationale de philosophie.

[11]  Karen Neander,et al.  Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense , 1991, Philosophy of Science.

[12]  F. Varela,et al.  CHAPTER NINE The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness , 2000, Naturalizing Phenomenology.

[13]  Daniel M. Dubois,et al.  Autonomy in Anticipatory Systems : Significance for Functionality , Intentionality and Meaning , 1998 .

[14]  R. Millikan In Defense of Proper Functions , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  F. Varela,et al.  NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem , 1996 .

[16]  Marina Basu The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[17]  John Collier,et al.  Dealing with the Unexpected , 2001 .

[18]  Daniel M. Dubois,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Discrete and Functional Systems with Strong and Weak Anticipations , 2003, ABiALS.

[19]  N. Boyce Life itself , 2018, The Lancet.